{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 3","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","id":"5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","uuid":"5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 3","normalized_title":"剩余价值学说史资本论第4卷3","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":458,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%89%A9%E4%BD%99%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%B4%E5%8F%B2%20%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%AC%AC4%E5%8D%B7%203","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c/search"},"page":{"printed_page":181,"pdf_page":191,"physical_index":191,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9244acdb72e50c8085e0306f647ba07524ca075304679474497afe356c1317fc"},"chapter":"剩余价值学说史","content":"但穆勒是怎样处理呢？\n\n他不是假设，资本家〔在除去不变资本之后〕，用60卡德〔的支出】，可以收获120卡德，却假设他是使用100个人，由这100个人，他取得180卡德：1劳动日的工资总被假定是等于1卡德。所以，计算如下：\n\n$$\n\\begin{array} { r l r } { \\vec { \\Sigma } \\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow \\dot { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\uparrow } \\vec { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\downarrow } \\dot { \\Sigma } } & { ( \\nabla \\mapsto \\nabla \\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow , \\ \\vec { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\uparrow } \\vec { \\Sigma } ) } & { \\vec { \\Sigma } \\ddot { \\downarrow } \\vec { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\uparrow } \\quad } \\\\ & { \\downarrow \\uparrow \\downarrow \\Sigma \\perp \\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow } \\\\ { 1 0 0 + \\vec { \\Sigma } \\ddot { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\Sigma } \\quad } & { ( 1 0 0 \\mp \\vec { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\downarrow } \\ 4 \\downarrow ) \\quad } & { 1 8 0 + \\vec { \\Sigma } \\ddot { \\Sigma } \\quad } & { 8 0 + \\vec { \\Sigma } \\ddot { \\Sigma } \\dot { \\downarrow } \\vec { \\Sigma } } \\end{array}\n$$\n\n那就是，资本家得到80%的利润。在这里，利润是等于剩余价值。从而，剩余价值率只等于80%;以前却是100%，更高20%。所以，在这里，我们有了这种现象：利润率增加了30%，剩余价值却减低了20%。如果资本家依旧只投60卡德在工资上面，我们就有了如下的计算：\n\n100卡德提供80卡德的剩余价值；\n\n10卡德提供8卡德的剩余价值；\n\n60卡德提供48卡德的剩余价值。\n\n但以前60卡德是提供60卡德(那就是更多20%)。或表示如下：\n\n剩余价值已经由100落到80（我们必须在两个场合，都以100卡\n\n第二篇 里嘉图学派的解体\n\n181","previous_page":180,"next_page":182}