{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 3","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","id":"5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","uuid":"5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 3","normalized_title":"剩余价值学说史资本论第4卷3","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":458,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%89%A9%E4%BD%99%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%B4%E5%8F%B2%20%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%AC%AC4%E5%8D%B7%203","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/5f15f12d-ed16-4ba1-ac49-43ef61bf3a0c/search"},"page":{"printed_page":232,"pdf_page":242,"physical_index":242,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a40067f61398aaaff598088638faa2cd093b7557638576b1d3b874843e9f95dc"},"chapter":"剩余价值学说史","content":"第一个小册子〔那个小册论者的著作〕，由里嘉图引出了正确的结论，从而把剩余价值还原为剩余劳动。这一点和里嘉图的反对派和后继者，都是反对的，因为他们都跟着他，像他一样，把剩余价值和利润混同起来。\n\n第二个小册子〔莱文斯登的著作】，也是和他们反对的。它更精密的确定了相对的剩余价值；这种剩余价值是依照劳动生产力的发展程度。里嘉图也说到这一层，但他避免了莱文斯登所引出的结论：劳动生产力的增加，只增加别人的支配他们的财富，资本。\n\n最后，第三个小册子〔荷治斯金〕，得到了一般的命题（那是里嘉图说明的必然的结论）：资本是不生产的。这个命题是和托伦斯，马尔萨斯等人相反的；他们一方面维持里嘉图的说明，但把里嘉图的命题劳动是价值的创造者，转变成为相反的命题：资本是价值的创造者。同时，他还反驳了那由斯密〔传〕到马尔萨斯，并在马尔萨斯手里夸张成为绝对教义的命题（詹姆士·穆勒也是这样）：劳动绝对依存于它的生存条件，那就是依存于现有的资本量。\n\n第一个著作是以这一个命题为结束：“富不外就是人所支配的时间。”\n\n232\n\n剩余价值学说史","previous_page":231,"next_page":233}