{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","uuid":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","normalized_title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","isbns":["9787100099400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":265,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/search"},"page":{"printed_page":150,"pdf_page":228,"physical_index":228,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b34b9f36380093610b827fc875f2514a3532feba56cee9d744d7adf1b82d59d3"},"chapter":"信息方式","content":"歧见与社区\n\n最终，《后现代状况》还是以一种直觉为基础，这种“弱”主张困扰利奥塔的程度似乎本不该有这么严重。利奥塔自认为是一个“哲学家”（第xxv页)，把自己归附于一个悠久的传统，该传统的覆盖范围始自柏拉图和前苏格拉底时期。种种直觉、明显招致争议的判断以及超越自身的陈述等都不能以推论佐证自身的主张，该传统可不那么容易就会接受它们。利奥塔时常流露出对哲学学科感到不适，例如他抱怨柏拉图式的论辩具有某种强制性质。 38然而他仍毫不犹疑地把自己界定在哲学的学科内。\n\n在《歧见》中，利奥塔更坚决地将自己的身份界定为哲学家。他收回早期作品中某些可能被认为是过分的地方，并且所进行的论辩也很像严格意义上的哲学表述。例如“习语”（phrase）已变成任何话语逻辑上不可缩约的基础，它从话语中自然流出，其方式有明显可辩的“哲学味”。但是如果当代话语受着元叙事危机的条件制约(conditioned)，哲学家的位置是否也必须受到质疑?起码从马克思和尼采以来就已有一大批思想家在这样做了。有一种含混不清很麻烦，它颠覆了利奥塔的文本：他想被承认为一个哲学家，但他的论辩却拒绝通常给予哲学家的那种认识论身份。\n\n第五章 利奥塔与电脑科学\n\n1 213\n\n150","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}