{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","uuid":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","normalized_title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","isbns":["9787100099400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":265,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/search"},"page":{"printed_page":192,"pdf_page":207,"physical_index":207,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5b16db479f8930cd0992a9d388743c97c4fb86c46045b44c3d9ffadb1a13f20a"},"chapter":"信息方式","content":"后现代的欲望\n\n在《千座高原》中，德勒兹和瓜塔里把社会看成是去中心化的并且是去主体化的，而他们为此进行的表述比福柯还要复杂。他们的早期著作《反俄狄浦斯》，依赖精神分裂欲望这个观念批判弗洛伊德和马克思的观点，而那个观念本身就值得怀疑。《千座高原》继续把欲望这种很成问题的观点提出来作为批判基础，但已包括着对社会和政治的后现代理论那颇有前景的详细阐述。该书试图瓦解对理论的线性呈现方式：“我们俩人合写了《反俄狄浦斯》。由于我们每一个人都是好几个人，因此我们已经是一群人了。……一本书既无客体又无主体；它是由形式多样的物质组成的……把一本书归功于某一主体便忽视了这些物质的作用，忽视了它们关系的外化性(exteriority)。”《千座高原》缺乏一个中心主体引导读者一步步深入，因此它便从文本形式上向现代理论发起挑战。同理，德勒兹和瓜塔里也鼓励读者随便从哪里开始阅读，因为他们并没有把该书组织成一篇连续不断的线性的论文。\n\n德勒兹和瓜塔里将社会构型为一种处于连续的非线性运动中的机体强度（bodilyintensities）的综合体。他们所呈现的逻辑是多维的、变换的、非连续性的。他们谈到层次(strata)、聚集(assemblages)、局域化(territorializations)、飞行线路(linesofflight)、抽象机器等一大堆术语，它们瓦解了诸种概念借助话语表述来控制一个领域的功能。他们的概念范畴切断了常规的理解线路，戳穿了支配现代社会理论的二元逻辑，这种现代社会理论从一种原始生命力的视角呈现现实图景。似乎在人类历史过程中，地球本身便会把这些变化描写在其表面，这一居高临下式的观点与个体的自我或者社会科学家受约束的意识相去甚远。\n\n192\n\n信息方式","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}