{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","uuid":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","normalized_title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","isbns":["9787100099400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":265,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/search"},"page":{"printed_page":196,"pdf_page":211,"physical_index":211,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"97a7d62705d47be9150dcb4bed45bcb90e23ce47b60d3bae8a6f8fb3c825e094"},"chapter":"信息方式","content":"他们对资本主义进行重新定义，从而阐明了他们的这一论点。对拉克洛和莫菲而言，资本主义秩序必然是不稳定的，其特征是不断的“对抗”(antagonisms)。霸权之所以得以实现，就是通过对这种不稳定性加以否认，就是通过把社会作为固定、自然、必然的存在而进行的话语构筑。然而语言侵入了差异的关系逻辑，这一逻辑颠覆着霸权话语，维持着种种新联系、新陈述的可能性，他者借此将对抗性认识强加于自我。拉克洛和莫菲提出一种多元主义的政治，这种政治将会把差异与对抗的状态接纳为一种新民主的基础。用他们的话来说，\n\n多种身份这种多元性的每项都能在其自身内部找到自己的有效性原则，不必在某个超验或潜在的实证领域内寻求这种原则；只是在这一程度上，多元论才是激进的。寻求这种原则便是为了建立所有这些身份的意义等级，并求证它们的合法性源泉与保证。这种激进多元论的每个项的自动构建性(autoconstitutivity）都是对平等想象界（the egalitarianimaginary）进行置换的结果；在这一程度上，这种激进的多元论是民主的。\n\n资本主义易遭批评，是因为它阻抑了身份的再构型过程，即对后现代民主进行界定的那种不稳定性。我们在下文将会看到，在让一弗郎索瓦·利奥塔的著作中，对这种多元论的理论辩护得到最令人信服的发展。\n\n196\n\n信息方式\n\n138","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}