{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","uuid":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","normalized_title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","isbns":["9787100099400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":265,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/search"},"page":{"printed_page":204,"pdf_page":219,"physical_index":219,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2ac508beb4bf4e264ac7efc02176e360d1f2b6424ee037972dd3b25e5a001a9a"},"chapter":"信息方式","content":"尽管科学对叙事话语要求苛刻，但在某个特定的意义上，科学还得依赖叙事：即科学要想合法化，便要依赖叙事。利奥塔争论说，自柏拉图以来，科学便在叙事中寻求立足点，在一种自身不具科学性的话语方式中寻求立足点。直至最近，这层关系的再生产仍是哲学的任务。哲学学科之所以变成主导话语，其部分原因就在于它自身扮演的角色便是为科学提供立足点。在《后现代状况》中，利奥塔区别了两种为科学提供立足点的哲学叙事：英、法、美的进步观念(第31页)，以及德国促进民族素质的教育观念(第34页)。然而，利奥塔的目的并不是从叙事角度重述科学史，而是要指出科学的这些叙事已不再可靠。利奥塔问道：当科学规划失去合法性时，科学以及如此深深依赖着科学的社会，其情形又会如何？我接着他的这个问题问下去，便提出本书的中心问题：当生成和撒播科学的电子手段方便可用、处处行使之时，\n\n204\n\n信息方式\n\n144","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}