{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","id":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","uuid":"60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title":"信息方式","normalized_title":"信息方式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100099400","isbns":["9787100099400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":265,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/60d761b6-db42-4384-92b5-eb5ed30d8081/search"},"page":{"printed_page":216,"pdf_page":231,"physical_index":231,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d85db7df7701f03399a5e28eb5a8c8c9e841f716dd25281adaa45b283c51c59d"},"chapter":"信息方式","content":"56页）在歧见中，差异的现实从本质上讲是“非可裁决的（non-adjudicable)”，对利奥塔而言，在这点上再没有什么能比奥斯威辛更说明问题了；“有了奥斯威辛，历史便发生了某种新的变化……也就是如下的一切都被极大地摧毁了：诸多事实、带有此地和此时的痕迹的种种证词、表明这些现实的某种意义或种种意义的诸多文献、诸多名字，以及各种不同种类的习语的可能性等，这些2习语的联合构成了现实。”（第57页）于是，奥斯威辛便是一个无法“被证明的”冤屈之名：“习语的认知体制（cognitiveregimen)被赋予了一种对历史的垄断权，历史学家必须结束这种垄断，必须大胆向前，倾听知识法则下不能呈现之事。”(第57页)\n\n于是，犹太人对利奥塔说来便很重要，是现代（themodern)的边界个案(boundarycase)。他们在政治理论中界定了现代的界限，因为他们所受的不公不可能被包容在理论范围内。这一论点在他最近出版的《海德格尔与“犹太人”》(Heidegger et“lesjuifs”)一书中得以展开。在该书中，利奥塔争论说，现代政治的特点是“恐怖主义的”话语，这种话语压制任何暗示它缺乏根据的言说，从而一直否认它自身缺乏根据。现代主义“根除”一切使之相对化的行为，因而赢得了合法性。犹太人在这场语言游戏中扮演了一个悲剧角色：“西方的精神’是为其自身确立基础，就此而言，犹太人’则抵制这种精神……沉迷于支配则不可能将他们驯化……”犹太人以现代缺乏根基而威胁西方，这令人想起一种不足，一种不可能被整合或压抑的不足。要想颠覆现代，侵越其可怕的边界，人们必须找到一个方法解除其压抑，找到一种途径表现其话语约束内不能呈现之事。\n\n216\n\n信息方式","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}