{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title":"理性的权威","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532763450","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","uuid":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title":"理性的权威","normalized_title":"理性的权威","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532763450","isbns":["9787532763450"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":171,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E6%9D%83%E5%A8%81","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":105,"pdf_page":113,"physical_index":113,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a24155dff6457f7cf7d3808c73fdd55dcd4069d9397f737e0266e1a16058cdb4"},"chapter":"The Last Word理性的权威","content":"如果可以选择一种纯粹的视角性的概念—在这种概念下，视角根本不再被置于任何客观的实在之中—那么这就不再是必然的。但是我认为并不存在这样的选择。基本上，我认为笛卡儿的我思是正确的。除非将其视为世界之中的某些东西无论世界包含的其他东西有多么少否则就不可能对自身作出任何思考。但是为了驳回康德提出的对理性范围的限制，还必须要有更多的主张。\n\n康德承认我们不得不把自己视为一个独立存在的世界的组成部分，但是他否认理性或知觉会告诉我们关于这一世界自身是怎么样甚至作为世界组成部分的我们自身究竟如何。事实上，根据康德的观点，我们甚至无法形成任何有关世界就像其自身所表现的那样的概念，因为，我们的能力每一次应用于理性，客观实在的理论的形成，以及发现关于表象的最佳解释，都被限制在它对现象世界的应用之中事物如何呈现在我们面前。\n\n五科 学\n\n105","previous_page":104,"next_page":106}