{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title":"理性的权威","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532763450","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","uuid":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title":"理性的权威","normalized_title":"理性的权威","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532763450","isbns":["9787532763450"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":171,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E6%9D%83%E5%A8%81","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":147,"pdf_page":155,"physical_index":155,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f2699f96ae20af4dbe466a199d48e7d28e95acc3c70bdb92b1f5fd665f337cde"},"chapter":"The Last Word理性的权威","content":"最后的一点柏拉图主义的色彩：\n\n要到达灵魂的最深处只能经由表层。如此一来，那些永久不变的形式，正是通过数学、哲学与其他一些科学帮助我们逐步掌握的东西，将会通过慢慢地渗透逐渐到达一个人的内心，并逐渐影响到我们的生活；而且它们之所以能这样做，不是因为它们中仅仅包含了至关重要的真理，而是因为它们[本身]就是理想的永久不变的真理。②\n\n现在我发现这些宣言不仅雄辩有力，而且也是完全相宜的；只是它们具有一种与当今的潮流格格不入的极端的反还原论和实在论的倾向。而且，就其认为纯粹的探究的规划③是由与自然的“内在统一”所支持的；我们并由此而引出了可以用事实加以检验的假说这一主张而言，它们更是惊人的柏拉图主义的。某些同类的东西就理性本身而言也必须是真的，也即如皮尔士所说是与“我们如何思考”并无关系的。①如果我们能够理性思考，则是因为我们的思想可能遵从于命题之间逻辑关系的规则—从而，在此我们又一次依赖于柏拉图式的和谐。\n\n七进化的自然主义和宗教的恐惧\n\n147\n\n① Peirce ,Reasoning and the Logic of Things , pp. 176 – 177.\n\n②同上书，pp.121-122。遗憾的是，在Peirce撰写这些演讲稿时，WilliamJames促使他较少关注逻辑，而更多地谈及“各个具有不可或缺的重要特征的独立主题”。(参见简介，第25页)\n\n③ 这是Bernard Williams为Descartes式的发现真理的努力，而不掺杂任何实际考虑的规划所起的名称;见他的Descartes:the Project of Pure Inquiry(Penguin,1978)。","previous_page":146,"next_page":148}