{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title":"理性的权威","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532763450","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","uuid":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title":"理性的权威","normalized_title":"理性的权威","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532763450","isbns":["9787532763450"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":171,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E6%9D%83%E5%A8%81","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":39,"pdf_page":47,"physical_index":47,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8c4d0e627f0def662d45909bcbdcff001d8b7f7f1a00a07cedc9a95e9800b51d"},"chapter":"The Last Word理性的权威","content":"加以限定的冲动非常难以抑制。抵制把理性的权威甚至是不能言说的理性的权威—赋予第一人称(无论是单数还是复数)的做法的持续的诱惑的唯一方法，就是弄清关于世界的一阶推理是如何不可避免地支配这些思想的，如果我们认真地对待这些思想的话。\n\n二我们为什么不能从外部来理解思想\n\n039\n\n① 这句话的基本意思是指人们完全没必要对本身就很清楚的事情加上更进一步的限制。它来自于Bernard Williams在一篇论文中对道德辩护的著名论证。在这一论证中，Williams称当某人的妻子与一位陌生人同时陷入危险之中时，这人去挽救他的妻子而不是那位陌生人。在进行相关的道德辩护时，这人只需要说“这是我的妻子”，而无须长篇累牍去谈思想，在这里，哪怕只有一种思想也会显得多余。——译者","previous_page":38,"next_page":null}