{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title":"理性的权威","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532763450","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","id":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","uuid":"6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title":"理性的权威","normalized_title":"理性的权威","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532763450","isbns":["9787532763450"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":171,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%90%86%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E6%9D%83%E5%A8%81","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6254e091-fea7-4580-ad1e-08ddba85762d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":54,"pdf_page":62,"physical_index":62,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e6ed95b6494117af9713669aba576a2a5fd2bdaf0fbfc4d0335621b4923c8f8f"},"chapter":"The Last Word理性的权威","content":"P·F·斯特劳森也曾十分有效地表明了对于“维特根斯坦式”的故事的反对：这是关于我们语言的一种“外在主义”的观点，从而就是与现象不相符的。\n\n作为思想者和言说者的我们，面对着关于维特根斯坦式的图像穷尽了现象，已经说尽了所有可说的这种主张，我们会发现它是难以相信的：我们会禁不住说：对我们最为明显的经验来说它完全不是真的；因为，我们所经验的并非仅仅是一种强制的力量，而只是感到这样说十分自然，其他人通常也是这样说的(对此我们可以观察到)，或是对此表示同意或是提出异议；恰恰相反，我们对我们所说的和听到的意义有着充分的理解，以致至少在某些时候，在人们的言说中能对相矛盾的地方以及对被认为应当仅仅归结于所说的意义的各个结果，作出识别。①\n\n3\n\n我希望能以这样一种坚决的反还原论的方式去理解维特根斯坦的立场，从而就不会给此类的反对意见留下任何余地。麻烦则在于他的某些被经常引用的评论似乎鼓励我们超越这样一点，对此他认为已没有任何更多的话可说；从而我们就必需对这为什么是一种误解作出解释。例如：\n\n054\n\n理性的权威\n\n① Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties (Columbia University Press, 1983), pp.90–91.","previous_page":53,"next_page":55}