{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","uuid":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","normalized_title":"帝国全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","isbns":["9787214049100"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":416,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B8%9D%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%9A%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E7%A7%A9%E5%BA%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/search"},"page":{"printed_page":180,"pdf_page":198,"physical_index":198,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"cfd222b3d85e33a23fefc18294dadbc034daaa4d77f311721cf3ee7ce2a5b9ca"},"chapter":"第九章 帝国主权","content":"第九章 帝国主权\n\n帝国的新人民相信新的开篇、新的章节，而我在继续在为旧故事而打拼。我希望，在故事结束之前，它能揭示出为何我们的努力是值得的。\n\n—J. M. 考特茨(J. M.Coetzee)\n\n现代对现代性的二元性的批判有着悠久的历史。然而，那一批判传统的立足点却是典型的现代式的。它处在危机的临界点，故而既在现代之内，又在现代之外。在向着帝国世界的转变过程中，边界地带已不再存有了，故而现代批判策略也不再有效。\n\n举个例子，我们可以考虑一下在现代欧洲哲学史上，自康德至福柯对“何谓启蒙”这个问题的不同回答。康德对启蒙作出了最经典的现代主义的描述：敢于获取知识，摆脱“不成熟”状态，在社会领域的中心欢庆公众对理性的运用。①福柯的答案，如果我们历史地去看，同康德的答案差别也并不巨大。福柯不必同腓特烈二世的暴政周旋，也不必像康德那样希望把暴政引向更具理性的政治。在他所处的法兰西第五共和国的政治系统中，广大的政治交换领域已为人们习以为然。然而，他的回答再一次强调要横跨传统意义上的“内部”主体性和“外部”社会空间；不过，福柯的划分把传统划分颠了个个儿，他把“内部”的系统同“外部”的主体性区分开。①现代批判的合理性，它的重心，就落在内与外的边界上。\n\n①参阅 Immanuel Kant 的文章“An Answer to the Question:'What Is Enlightenment?'”,该义 收录入 Political Writing,Hans Peiss 编(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1991)。\n\n180","previous_page":179,"next_page":181}