{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","uuid":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","normalized_title":"帝国全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","isbns":["9787214049100"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":416,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B8%9D%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%9A%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E7%A7%A9%E5%BA%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/search"},"page":{"printed_page":181,"pdf_page":199,"physical_index":199,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6c1d02e6c9be2efae39bbb6df44792ef5c4e4fb50c350f1e87a931bd2eece020"},"chapter":"第九章 帝国主权","content":"福柯的确加入了另一条通过质询寻求超越边界和公众领域的现代观。“重要的是……如何才能使能力的增长同权力关系的激化相脱离？”这一新的任务要求使用新的方法：“我们必须超越非内即外的选择。”福柯的回答仍是相当传统的：“我们必须走上前线。”②最后，福柯对启蒙的哲学批判又回到启蒙的立足点，就在这内与外的潮涨潮落中，对现代性的批判最终未能突破现代性本身的术语和局限，而是在它的边界上静止下来。\n\n边界地带—这个既属于内部，又属于外部的地带—成了批判权力系统的立足点。同样的观念也激发出现代政治理论的批判传统。长期以来，现代共和制的特点之一就是它结合了现实的基础和空想的创新。共和总是将自己的根基牢牢地扎在主流历史进程之中。可同时它又寻求改变政治领域，从而为自己创造出一个外部，一个解放的开放空间。我们认为，这一批判传统的三个最具代表性的人物是马基雅维利、斯宾诺莎和马克思。他们的思想总是把基础建立于真实的现代主权形成过程之中，他们试图引爆这一过程中的矛盾，为一个另类社会的出现开辟出空间。外部从内部建立起来。\n\n对马基雅维利而言，建立起民主政治的生成性力量诞生于中世纪秩序的破裂中，诞生于规范向现代性转变时所出现的混乱局面的必须中。\n\n第九章 帝国主权\n\n①参阅 Michel Foucault 的文章“What Is Enlightenment”，该文收录入 The Essential Works ofFoucault 1954-1984 的第一卷 Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, Paul Rabinow 编(New York:New Press, 1997)。\n\n②同上。\n\n181","previous_page":180,"next_page":182}