{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","uuid":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","normalized_title":"帝国全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","isbns":["9787214049100"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":416,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B8%9D%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%9A%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E7%A7%A9%E5%BA%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/search"},"page":{"printed_page":26,"pdf_page":44,"physical_index":44,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"507760a2f46b2a560eb53d5d7fffa3a38a410b5d62223910e8b891e8101acb8d"},"chapter":"第二章 生态政治生产","content":"在从规训社会向控制社会的转变中，我们可以说资本主义在发展全过程中始终孜孜以求的一切社会力量互为影射的关系得到全面实现，马克思曾确认某种类似的东西，他称之为资本对劳动力的形式吸纳到实在吸纳的过渡。②后来法兰克福学派的哲学家们也分析了一个与之紧密相联的过程—文化(以及社会关系)被吸纳入集权国家，或更确切地说被吸纳入畸形的启蒙辩证法的过程。③然而，我们所提到的转变过程与上述过程有着根本区别。马克思的描述关注过程的单维性，法兰克福学派后来仅仅对马克思的描述进行了重述和扩充。与之不同，福柯论及的过程在根本上触及多元性和复杂性—在德勒兹和瓜塔里那里，这种观察视角发展得更为明确。④当实在吸纳被理解为不仅包裹了社会的经济或文化维度，而且包裹了整个社会有机体，并且当对实在吸纳的分析关注到规训和/或控制的模态，那么这种分析就可打破资本主义发展那单向、整体的形象。市民社会被吸纳入国家之中，可结果却是，原先在市民社会中得到协调和调解的各种因素将会爆发。反抗不再徘徊在边缘，而是活跃于在网络系统中处于开放的社会的核心。因此，福柯的建构隐隐指出权力的悖论(德勒兹和瓜塔里使这种隐含意义明晰化)：就在权力完成了大一统，将社会生活的一切成分都包容在自身之内的那一刻，它也使一个新的社会环境得到显现。那是一个有着千差万别，由最大限度的多层性和不可被吸纳的单一性构成的复杂环境，这是每个单一事件都有自己独特性的环境。①\n\n政治学前沿系列·帝国\n\n①许多思想家都追随Foucault，并成功地对福利国家这一事物提出责难。读者主要可参阅Jacuqes Donzelot 的专著L'invention du social(Paris: Fayard,1984)和 FranÇois Ewald 的专著L'état providence(Paris:Seuil,1986)。\n\n②读者可参阅马克思的一篇文章“Results of the Immediate Process of Production”，该文作为《资本论》的附录被出版。读者也可参阅 Antonio Negri的专著Marx beyond Marx(NewYork:Autonomedia,1991)。\n\n③参阅 Marx Horkheimer 和 Theodor Adorno 的合著 The Dialectic of Enlightenment (NewYork:Herder and Herder,1972)。\n\n④参阅 Gilles Deleuze 和 Félix Guattari 的合著A Thousand Plateaus(Minneapolis: Universityof Minnesota Press, 1972)。\n\n26","previous_page":25,"next_page":27}