{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","uuid":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","normalized_title":"帝国全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","isbns":["9787214049100"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":416,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B8%9D%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%9A%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E7%A7%A9%E5%BA%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/search"},"page":{"printed_page":277,"pdf_page":295,"physical_index":295,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a460139148e66900905b42aaa4317039857d4328dbbaa94c6f9846275e979212"},"chapter":"第十三章 后现代化或生产的信息化","content":"然而，不发达理论家他们自己也在重复一种相似的经济发展的虚假论调③。我们可以用三段论话来说，他们的逻辑开始于两种有效的历史观点，但从中推出了一条错误的结论。首先，他们认定，通过殖民体制和(或)其他帝国主义统治形式的强制施行，附属经济的欠发达被创造出来，并通过融入全球主要资本主义经济的网络之中得以维系，进而对那些主要的经济有了真正的持续依赖。其次，他们宣称主要经济自身当初已经在相对孤立中发展了充分表达的独立结构，只与其他经济及全球网络进行有限的互动④。\n\n可是，他们从这两个多少可接受的观点然后就推导出一个无效的结论：如果发达经济在相对孤立中取得了充分的表达，而不发达经济变得失语和在融入全球网络后形成依赖，那么让不发达经济相对孤立的计划则将导向它们的发展和充分表达。换而言之，作为对主要资本主义国家的经济学家所误导出来的“错误发展”的替换，不发达方面的理论家则倡导“真正的发展”包括一种经济与其依靠的关系摆脱联系，并在相对孤立中体现一种自足的经济结构。既然这就是主要经济发展的方式，它必然应是躲避不发达循环的真正道路。然而，这种推理让我们相信经济发展的规律会以某种方式超越历史变迁的种种差异。\n\n第十三章 后现代化或生产的信息化\n\n① 不发达和依赖理论的经典解说见 Andre Gunder Frank, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America(New York: Monthly Review Press, 1967) ;and Fernando Enrique Cardoso and Enzo Faletto, Dependency and Development in Latin America(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979)。关于对发展阶段的各种观点的非常精辟的批评，见 Immanuel Wallerstein，The Capitalist World-Economy(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1979)。\n\n②发展的分析是一种幻觉，它是一种真实有效的幻觉，通过“发展”世界建立了它自身的结构和权力机构。论发展的制度化，见Arturo Escobar，Encountering Development:The Makingand Unmaking of the Third World(Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1995)。\n\n③关于对依赖理论的发展主义思想意识的批判，同上。\n\n④例见 Claude Ake, A Political Economy of Africa(Hariow,Essex: Longman,1981)。\n\n277","previous_page":276,"next_page":278}