{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","uuid":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","normalized_title":"帝国全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","isbns":["9787214049100"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":416,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B8%9D%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%9A%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E7%A7%A9%E5%BA%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/search"},"page":{"printed_page":37,"pdf_page":55,"physical_index":55,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3d4c73c99eafbb4b2af75d2ebda532c36e677a9eed05f4f2bc74edbf610a0dc2"},"chapter":"第二章 生态政治生产","content":"第二章 生态政治生产\n\n①参阅 Jürgen Habermas 之专著Theory of Communicative Action (Boston: Beacon Press,1984)。在本书第13章，我们将更详细地讨论这一交流和生产之间的关系。\n\n② 参阅 Hardt 和 Negri 的合著 Labor of Dionysus 的第六和第七章。\n\n③在 Martin Albrow 和 Elizabeth King 合编的论文集 Globalization, Knowledge, and Society(London:Sage,1991)中，文章的作者们表现得有些极端。相对而言，Bryan S. Turner的Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity(London:Sage,1990)和 Mike Featherstone 主编的论文集 Global Culture, Nationalism, Globalization, and Modernity (London:Sage, 1991)就要温和一些。尽管如此，他们在许多立场上并没有大的差别。我们应始终记住，所谓“全球市民社会”不仅产生自某些后现代主义哲学家的心中，产生于Habermas的追随者中，它更产生于国际关系的洛克式传统中，面这后一点具有更大的重要性。这后者所涉及到的重要理论家如 Richard Falk,David Held,Anthony Giddens,在某些方面也包括 Danilo Zolo。关于全球化背景中的市民社会概念，读者可参阅 Michael Walzer 主编的 Toward a Global CivilSociety (Providence: Berghahn Books,1995)。\n\n37","previous_page":36,"next_page":38}