{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","id":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","uuid":"6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title":"帝国：全球化的政治秩序","normalized_title":"帝国全球化的政治秩序","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214049100","isbns":["9787214049100"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":416,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%B8%9D%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%9A%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E7%A7%A9%E5%BA%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6501a938-d72c-455e-aee4-85513a77faa5/search"},"page":{"printed_page":49,"pdf_page":67,"physical_index":67,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"eda67885a18478300a9b8a455fd7abdfc1e59525eebdcce42f09e3552fa81964"},"chapter":"第三章 帝国内部的另类","content":"以这种左派策略去反抗全球化，保卫地方性的做法也具有危害性。因为在很多情况下，表现为地方认同的东西并非自发和自律的，而是在支持着资本主义的发展，是帝国机器的燃料。实际上，由帝国机器掌控的全球化或领土去界并不反对地方化和领土划界，而是驱动调节起流动变幻的分化和同一之流。地方抵抗策略认错了，从而也掩盖了真正的敌人。我们绝非反对关系的全球化这件事本身。实际上，正如我们在前面提到，左派国际主义中最强大的力量曾有效地领导了这一进程。真正的敌人是一种特定的全球关系统治形式，我们称之为帝国。更重要的是，那种保卫地方的策略的危害性正在于它模糊了，甚至否定了确实存在于帝国之内的异端另类和解放的潜能。我们应一劳永逸地终结对世外桃源的追寻，打消那种可以保持我们的政治纯洁的幻想。无论是在理论上，还是在实践中，更好的做法是进入帝国，面对它的同质化和异质化流动中的各种复杂状况，将我们的分析建立在全球民众的力量之上。\n\n第三章 帝国内部的另类\n\n①“我认为处所是人类活动的一个基本物质属性，但我也认识到处所的产生也是社会性的。”这句话出自 David Harvey 的专著 The Limits of Capital (Chicago: University of ChicagoPress,1984)的第 374 页。Arjun Appadurai 对“处所性的产生”所做的讨论也是和 Harvey 以及我们的论述相吻合的。参见其专著Modernity at Large:Cultural Dimensions of Globalism(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,1996)。\n\n49","previous_page":48,"next_page":50}