{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781786632623","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea","id":"6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea","uuid":"6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea","title":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism A Manifesto","normalized_title":"fullyautomatedluxurycommunismamanifesto","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781786632623","isbns":["9781786632623","9781788732468","9781786632654","9781786632647"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":288,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Fully%20Automated%20Luxury%20Communism%20A%20Manifesto","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/6dfd053e-a721-41da-a147-63bee43ea5ea/search"},"page":{"printed_page":57,"pdf_page":66,"physical_index":66,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b4d3c157d81d10630c385b73fc55e214efe75078c47a56961161ece46f19a9fd"},"chapter":"Fully Automated Luxury Communism","content":"Keynes was an open critic of Marx despite also claiming to have never read him. And yet here one sees remarkable parallels between the two. For Marx, communism was a condition of abundance, a society where labour and leisure dissolved into each other, and where our natures were developed in a manner consistent with play. This was a world where scarcity – or as Keynes refers to it, ‘the economic problem’ – would finally be vanquished. In 1930 Keynes speculated about something remarkably similar and, amazingly, even had the confidence to put a date on it – foreseeing the arrival of postscarcity as soon as 2030.\n\nOther than Keynes’s stated disdain for Marx’s class-based politics in ‘preferring the mud to the fish’, what was it precisely that separated the two? The answer is the relationship between progress and politics. Unlike Marx, Keynes viewed capitalism as inevitably shifting to greater abundance, this resulting from its ability to become ever more productive over time while reducing the demand for labour. In Economic Possibilities his claim was that this would translate to a shorter working week, with improvements in productivity as technology progressed benefitting workers. In other words, leisure time was destined to increase while the need to work would slowly fade from view.\n\nMarx, who likewise insisted on capitalism’s ability to improve productivity, did not believe this benefitted anyone but the wealthy under the status quo, despite the possibility to do so. While Marx observed the same tendency to potential abundance, he viewed this as politically contested – with the spoils only going to the majority of society if they successfully fought for them in the struggle between classes.\n\nWhat Is Fully Automated Luxury Communism?\n\n57","previous_page":56,"next_page":58}