{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","title":"微粒社会 数字化时代的社会模式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508679136","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","id":"7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","uuid":"7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","title":"微粒社会 数字化时代的社会模式","normalized_title":"微粒社会数字化时代的社会模式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508679136","isbns":["9787508679136"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":233,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%AE%E7%B2%92%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E6%97%B6%E4%BB%A3%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355/search"},"page":{"printed_page":141,"pdf_page":160,"physical_index":160,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5d4dee253c734ca12021ab9ab73cd93cbae012371989cf27d9aad1eaa5d1f9e6"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"所以翻滚着涌向诸如议会和法院这类机构的是一波无法抉择的决定，是一场无法解决的问题的海啸。我们现在或许能够提出反对，将这样一场关于死亡或偏爱的辩论排除在德国之外。德国的法律禁止对人的生命进行比较，主流观点认为每个人都有着同样的“最高价值”。因此5个孩子并不比一个退休者具有更高的价值。这就是所谓的“禁止抵消原则”。然而在德国法律的一些规定中，受害者的数量也会导致罪犯量刑上的不同当然是在谋杀案中，或者在危害公共安全的情况(《德国刑法典》第3章第2节条款22)或是紧急状况中。杀害5个人确实比杀害一个人更严重。\n\n我们也不能永远用未来敷衍自己。有些问题今天就已经出现了，比如自主的攻击型无人机。佐治亚理工学院的罗纳德·阿金受美国军方所托，在无人机程序中写入《日内瓦公约》的条例。相较而言，公约清楚明了，有对宗教场所和医院进行保护的清楚说明。阿金教会无人机不断地从法律角度检验它们的选择：飞行，射击空地上的坦克，发现建筑物前的坦克，检视建筑物，辨认出建筑物为清真寺后停止攻击。阿金借助在阿富汗战争中得到的数据对他的程序进行检验，大部分时候，程序就像一个人类操作员一样做着决策。他将此视为一个向机器植入伦理学的例证。\n\n141\n\n第四章超负荷的制度","previous_page":140,"next_page":142}