{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","title":"微粒社会 数字化时代的社会模式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508679136","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","id":"7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","uuid":"7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","title":"微粒社会 数字化时代的社会模式","normalized_title":"微粒社会数字化时代的社会模式","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787508679136","isbns":["9787508679136"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":233,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BE%AE%E7%B2%92%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%20%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8C%96%E6%97%B6%E4%BB%A3%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7519e7db-a39f-4ca7-adbd-76f73bc8f355/search"},"page":{"printed_page":23,"pdf_page":42,"physical_index":42,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b44d0f853ec2973e43160a0088ffc33afdf9b2e80761bf03bda627867fa120e0"},"chapter":"微粒","content":"有些人在这种交织中看到了一种非常积极的发展，比如萨沙·伊森伯格就得出结论，认为奥巴马的选战再次将人们重新聚集在一起。虽然奥巴马将选民简化成关键数据与识别码，但也因此考虑到了他们的个性。奥巴马像地方选举的候选人一样对待全美国的选民：针对每个选民、直接、充满尊重。电视和广播等大众传媒似乎将选战变成了一种匿名的、令人疏远的活动，伊森伯格认为数据分析却使人们朝着之前美好的选举时代迈进了一步，那时的候选人与选民私下相识，并且会与选民逐个交谈。这场高科技选举使人们退回到了纯朴的旧时期，而程序算法正带来人与人之间的温情。\n\n这很美妙，不是吗？\n\n微粒化的民主\n\n计算机程序对选民的筛选与竞选候选人和选民在花园门口的握手并不是一回事，因为在握手的过程中，候选人与选民是面对面的，而且至少在谈话过程中存在一种基本的对称性—假如可以忽略选民的微弱优势的话：选民对候选人的了解可能往往要比候选人对某个选民的了解更多。\n\n相反，由程序算法分配的关注，依靠的是分析者的计算艺术与选民对此并不知情之间的非对称性，根本就谈不上私人谈话中的势均力敌、相互了解。更确切地说，在微粒化的选战中，根本性的民主平等将受到威胁。\n\n023\n\n第一章差异革命","previous_page":22,"next_page":24}