{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title":"规则的悖论 想象背后的技术、愚笨与权力诱惑 = The Utopia of Rules On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","uuid":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title":"规则的悖论 想象背后的技术、愚笨与权力诱惑 = The Utopia of Rules On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy","normalized_title":"规则的悖论想象背后的技术愚笨与权力诱惑theutopiaofrulesontechnologystupidityandthesecretjoysofbureaucracy","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":236,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%A7%84%E5%88%99%E7%9A%84%E6%82%96%E8%AE%BA%20%E6%83%B3%E8%B1%A1%E8%83%8C%E5%90%8E%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E3%80%81%E6%84%9A%E7%AC%A8%E4%B8%8E%E6%9D%83%E5%8A%9B%E8%AF%B1%E6%83%91%20%3D%20The%20Utopia%20of%20Rules%20On%20Technology%2C%20Stupidity%2C%20and%20the%20Secret%20Joys%20of%20Bureaucracy","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":119,"pdf_page":118,"physical_index":118,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8e1fda323a399224f3c331edf14b7e9e69ed13d6051451d2338b2a3751532121"},"chapter":"第二章 论飞行汽车与下降的利润率","content":"社会科学领域的研究大部分仍然由个人开展，开支极小；如果社会科学领域尚且如此，物理学者的境况有多糟可想而知。事实上，一位物理学者最近就告诫那些有意以科研为业的学生，即使你总算熬过了动辄十年之久的跟在他人身后阿谀奉承的阶段，你最棒的想法还是会四处碰壁。\n\n你（将）把时间花在做计划而不是做研究上。雪上加霜的是，因为你的研究计划会被竞争对手评判，所以你不能追随好奇心，只能将精力和才能用于预判和转移批评，而非用于解决重要的科学难题……众所周知，原创想法是研究计划的绝唱；因为它们的有效性还未经证实。27\n\n这基本回答了为什么我们没有瞬间移动装置或反重力鞋的问题。常识表明，要想最大限度地发挥科学创造力，你只需找来一些聪明人，提供必要的资源以便他们实现脑海中的任何想法，然后给他们一段独处的时间。大多数人或许会一无所获，但一两个人很可能会有一些完全出乎意料的发现。要想将意外突破的可能性降至最低，你只需告诉那同一批人，他们获取资源的唯一途径就是花费大量时间争相说服你，让你相信他们知道自己即将发现什么。<sup>28</sup>\n\n这基本就是我们现有的系统。<sup>29</sup>\n\n在自然科学领域，除了管理主义的暴政，还存在研究成果的悄然私有化。正如英国经济学家大卫·哈维（DavidHarvie）近来提醒我们的那样，“开源”研究并不新鲜。从学者共享材料和成果的意义上看，学术研究一直是开源的。竞争固然存在，但借用他精妙的说法，竞争是“友好\n\n119","previous_page":118,"next_page":120}