{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title":"规则的悖论 想象背后的技术、愚笨与权力诱惑 = The Utopia of Rules On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","uuid":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title":"规则的悖论 想象背后的技术、愚笨与权力诱惑 = The Utopia of Rules On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy","normalized_title":"规则的悖论想象背后的技术愚笨与权力诱惑theutopiaofrulesontechnologystupidityandthesecretjoysofbureaucracy","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":236,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%A7%84%E5%88%99%E7%9A%84%E6%82%96%E8%AE%BA%20%E6%83%B3%E8%B1%A1%E8%83%8C%E5%90%8E%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E3%80%81%E6%84%9A%E7%AC%A8%E4%B8%8E%E6%9D%83%E5%8A%9B%E8%AF%B1%E6%83%91%20%3D%20The%20Utopia%20of%20Rules%20On%20Technology%2C%20Stupidity%2C%20and%20the%20Secret%20Joys%20of%20Bureaucracy","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":182,"pdf_page":181,"physical_index":181,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"df3eb6f80b05aca97688b2d6a3a839e5a36a00c2a578465d26ee2f0da936b5f3"},"chapter":"第三章 规则的乌托邦，或为什么我们终究还是喜欢官僚制","content":"\\*\\* \\*\n\n我想在此思考一下这部电影烂在哪里。因为，古怪的是，这很重要。我认为尝试弄清楚是什么让《黑暗骑士崛起》这么糟糕，本身有助于加深对很多事情的理解——关于电影、暴力、警察、国家权力的本质。\n\n我认为有个问题从一开始就该明确。这部电影确实是一部反占领运动宣传片。有些人还在否认这一点。导演克里斯托弗·诺兰公开强调剧本是在运动开始之前写的，并声称占领纽约（“哥谭”）的著名场景参考的其实是狄更斯对法国大革命的记述，而不是“占领华尔街”运动本身。这让我觉得很虚伪。众所周知，好莱坞剧本在创作过程中会不断改写，最后常常与初始文本面貌迥异；此外，就信息传递而言，小到一个场景在哪儿取景（“我知道了，让警察在纽约证券交易所前面与贝恩的追随者对峙！”）或是一个措辞上的微调（“我们把‘控制’改成‘占领’吧”）就能让一切大不相同。\n\n还有明摆着的事实，片中反派确实占领了华尔街，也攻击了证券交易所。\n\n我想说，毁掉这部电影的恰恰就是这种关联现实的渴望，是主创们敢于处理当前重大议题的事实。这格外令人难过，因为三部曲的前两部——《侠影之谜》（Batman Begins）和《黑暗骑士》（The DarkKnight）——都有过真正的雄辩时刻。它们反映出诺兰确实对人类心理有些有意思的见地，特别是在创造性和暴力的关系上（很难想象哪个成功的动作片导演不是这样）。《黑暗骑士崛起》比前两部野心更大。它敢于站在宏大的时代背景下发声。可结果是，它变得磕磕巴巴，不能自洽。\n\n182","previous_page":181,"next_page":183}