{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title":"规则的悖论 想象背后的技术、愚笨与权力诱惑 = The Utopia of Rules On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","uuid":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title":"规则的悖论 想象背后的技术、愚笨与权力诱惑 = The Utopia of Rules On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy","normalized_title":"规则的悖论想象背后的技术愚笨与权力诱惑theutopiaofrulesontechnologystupidityandthesecretjoysofbureaucracy","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":236,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%A7%84%E5%88%99%E7%9A%84%E6%82%96%E8%AE%BA%20%E6%83%B3%E8%B1%A1%E8%83%8C%E5%90%8E%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E3%80%81%E6%84%9A%E7%AC%A8%E4%B8%8E%E6%9D%83%E5%8A%9B%E8%AF%B1%E6%83%91%20%3D%20The%20Utopia%20of%20Rules%20On%20Technology%2C%20Stupidity%2C%20and%20the%20Secret%20Joys%20of%20Bureaucracy","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":201,"pdf_page":200,"physical_index":200,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"18350449736c4211294356a13760d0435e0c858d28c098b17e49668e09b01a69"},"chapter":"第三章 规则的乌托邦，或为什么我们终究还是喜欢官僚制","content":"8 特殊的历史际遇使得“liberal”（自由主义者）一词在美国的含义有别于世界其他地方。这一术语最初适用于自由市场的狂热拥趸，这层含义如今依然适用于世界上许多地方。在美国，该词被社会民主主义者占用，因而遭到右派的割席；自由市场拥趸们不得不改用“libertarian”（自由至上主义）一词，其原义通“无政府主义”，使用场景类似于“自由至上社会主义者”（libertarian socialist）或“自由至上共产主义者”（libertarian communist）。\n\n9 事实上，路德维希·冯·米塞斯的立场在内核上是反民主的，至少就如下这点而言：它虽倾向于拒斥任何形式的国家解决方案，但与此同时，它也反对左翼的反国家主义立场，后者提倡在国家外部创建民主的自组织形式。\n\n10 在涂尔干的传统中，这后来被称为“契约中的非契约元素”（thenon-contractual element in contract）——无疑是社会学术语中极不起眼的一个。最早的相关讨论见于《社会分工论》［The Division of Labor inSociety(New York:Free Press,1984 (1893), p. 162］。\n\n11 米歇尔·福柯关于新自由主义的论文认为这就是新旧自由主义的区别：那些宣扬市场的人现在明白了，市场不是自发形成的，而是必须通过政府干预来培育和维持的。Naissance de la biopolitique（《生命政治的诞生》），Michel Senellart,ed.(Paris:Gallimard, 2004)。\n\n12 “我不知道自己曾多少次用到‘政府官僚’这个词。你永远找不到一个政客是不带贬义在使用这个词的。也就是说，我们知道纳税人有多\n\n201","previous_page":200,"next_page":202}