{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title":"规则的悖论 想象背后的技术、愚笨与权力诱惑 = The Utopia of Rules On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","id":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","uuid":"7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title":"规则的悖论 想象背后的技术、愚笨与权力诱惑 = The Utopia of Rules On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy","normalized_title":"规则的悖论想象背后的技术愚笨与权力诱惑theutopiaofrulesontechnologystupidityandthesecretjoysofbureaucracy","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":236,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%A7%84%E5%88%99%E7%9A%84%E6%82%96%E8%AE%BA%20%E6%83%B3%E8%B1%A1%E8%83%8C%E5%90%8E%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E3%80%81%E6%84%9A%E7%AC%A8%E4%B8%8E%E6%9D%83%E5%8A%9B%E8%AF%B1%E6%83%91%20%3D%20The%20Utopia%20of%20Rules%20On%20Technology%2C%20Stupidity%2C%20and%20the%20Secret%20Joys%20of%20Bureaucracy","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7849bdaa-511d-4943-bbd6-e5f93c32627e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":204,"pdf_page":203,"physical_index":203,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9b62f4eb929ca82d14c8f13092266924ab73fc164c9eda459848034789cbefb6"},"chapter":"第三章 规则的乌托邦，或为什么我们终究还是喜欢官僚制","content":"Duménil）和多米尼克·莱维（Dominique Lévy）合著的Capital\n\nResurgent:The Roots of the Neoliberal Revolution（Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversity Press,2004），以及The Crisis of Neoliberalism（Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press, 2013）。实际上，投资者和高管开始成为同一个阶层——他们彼此结合了，而横跨金融和企业管理领域的职业路径变得司空见惯。根据拉佐尼克的说法，从经济上看，影响最恶劣的是股票回购的做法。早在20世纪五六十年代，如果一家公司花上百万美元购入自家股票以推高其市值，可能被认定为非法操纵市场。自80年代起，随着高管们越来越多地以股票形式获取薪酬，此举已成常规操作；数万亿美元的企业收益重新流入了华尔街，而放到早些年，这些钱原本应被用于扩大业务、雇用工人或投入研发。\n\n21 从20世纪80年代开始兴起的一句流行语是“生活自由，财务保守”（lifestyle liberal, fiscal conservative）。这指的是那些已经内化了60年代反主流文化的社会价值观，但开始以投资者的眼光看待经济的人。\n\n22 需要明确一点，这绝对不是主流媒体中的情况，例如《纽约时报》（The New York Times）、《华盛顿邮报》（The WashingtonPost）等报纸，以及《纽约客》（TheNewYorker）、《大西洋月刊》（TheAtlantic）或《哈泼斯》（Harper’s）等杂志。在这样的机构中，新闻学学位可能是减分项。至少这个论点只适用于小型媒体。但总体趋势始终是文凭主义在所有领域内的扩大化，有增无减。\n\n23 www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/05/college-promiseeconomy-does-no-201451411124734124.html。引文来自Saving Higher Education in the Age of Money (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2005),p.85。下文续道：“为什么美国人觉得这是一项正当的要求，或 至少是必要的？因为他们就这么觉得。我们已经弃理性而去，进入了信\n\n204","previous_page":203,"next_page":205}