{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346","title":"数字劳动： 理论前沿与在地经验","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214266118","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346","id":"7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346","uuid":"7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346","title":"数字劳动： 理论前沿与在地经验","normalized_title":"数字劳动理论前沿与在地经验","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787214266118","isbns":["9787214266118"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":229,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%EF%BC%9A%20%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%E4%B8%8E%E5%9C%A8%E5%9C%B0%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7b1ebe25-51ed-420e-89b8-2a8b9a1ca346/search"},"page":{"printed_page":44,"pdf_page":66,"physical_index":66,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e9b32cf480484093e0e9b8424f86eb2b072b601faf69d0b4ade3dd33bbfdd884"},"chapter":"第一章 数字劳动：劳动与媒介化的交叉视角","content":"另一方面是对媒介劳动化的抵抗。面对媒介资本将人类的社交和传播能力置入资本积累陷阱的实质吸纳(real subsumption)过程，吴鼎铭分析了几种抵抗形式：其一是另类媒体与数字公有地的建设，其二是“盗用”与“游击”式的抵抗，其三是“被遗忘权”的伸张，并上升至对“生命政治”剥削的抗争。③针对人类上网活动已成为具有抽象劳动特征的一般数据生产过程，阿列塔·伊瓦拉(ArrietaIbarra)等学者提出要从作为资本的数据(Data as Capital)向作为劳动的数据(Data as Labour)的理论转型，数据是用户的财产，应使其所有者受益，公司有必要为人们的数据付费，并以此创造新的就业机会，培养具有“数字尊严”的文化。④同样，合作化运动也波及了数据领域，2012年，意大利合作社联合会(Legacoop)发布了《合作公地》(Cooperative Commons)宣言，呼吁将合作社运动的经验教训用于控制线上数据。叶夫根尼·莫罗佐夫(Evgeny Morozov)则建议人们直接创建数据所有权合作社。①2016年，瑞士苏黎世出现了一家非营利性的线上合作社Midata，其宗旨是成为会员医疗数据的交换平台。\n\n数字劳动：理论前沿与在地经验\n\n①袁文全、徐新鹏：《共享经济视阈下隐蔽雇佣关系的法律规制》，《政法论坛》2018年第1期。\n\n② Scholz, Trebor. Uberworked and Underpaid : How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy. New York: Polity, 2016.\n\n③吴鼎铭：《互联网时代的“数字劳工”研究—网络“受众”研究的政治经济学视角》，武汉大学新闻与传播学院博士论文，2015年。\n\n④ Arrieta Ibarra, Imanol, Goff, Leonard, Jiménez Hernández, Diego, Lanier, Jaron and E. Glen Weyl. Should We Treat Data as Labour? Moving Beyond \"Free\". American Economic Association Papers &. Proceedings, 2017(1).\n\n44","previous_page":43,"next_page":45}