{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431","title":"技术与时间 3：电影的时间与存在之痛的问题","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726474","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431","id":"7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431","uuid":"7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431","title":"技术与时间 3：电影的时间与存在之痛的问题","normalized_title":"技术与时间3电影的时间与存在之痛的问题","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726474","isbns":["9787544726474","1111101000"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":344,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%203%EF%BC%9A%E7%94%B5%E5%BD%B1%E7%9A%84%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E4%B8%8E%E5%AD%98%E5%9C%A8%E4%B9%8B%E7%97%9B%E7%9A%84%E9%97%AE%E9%A2%98","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7e4c841a-b79b-4458-bd26-8f762fabd431/search"},"page":{"printed_page":217,"pdf_page":231,"physical_index":231,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ed7a25e20db4c8eb716673372cb418f702efb0dee90775b2614ff382ab041818"},"chapter":"第五章进行区别","content":"然而事实上，拥有某一世界之所以就是“此在”的空间性，必须是因为在世性本身恰是“此在”所是的时间性的在世性。空间性就是“此在”的在世性。然而，与“已经在此”一样，“此在”的在世性同时也是、而且首先就是它的时间性。因此，“此在”的空间性就是它的时间性。换句话说，时间性本身必须是“在世的”(该形容词的含义与海德格尔在阐述“内在的在世的”时间性之时赋予该词的含义不一样，但又必须将“内在在世性”涵盖在内)，这样才能够使得“此在”的时间性(“此在”必然是此在的时间)所具有的在世性对前者(即“此在”的时间性)进行组织，正如对“综合”进行调节那样。\n\n简言之，“正如记得某一客体的位置的必要性所体现的那样，真正的先验性并非康德所定义的空间，而是在世界之中存在””，也即从各种第三持留中继承(传输与“接受”)而来的时间，而且第三持留既有空间性，又有时间性，也就是说它们先于(像延迟差异那样)空间与时间之间的差异。必须从这些方面来提出当前方位区划的问题，也即空间性的问题(世界的空间性，而非空间的空间性):方位区划问题的提出，与时程区划的问题不可分离。\n\n第五章进行区别\n\n① 费罗南科，《何谓在思想中确定方向?》的导言，出处同前，第69页。\n\n217","previous_page":216,"next_page":218}