{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2","title":"人工智能哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7532740544","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2","id":"7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2","uuid":"7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2","title":"人工智能哲学","normalized_title":"人工智能哲学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7532740544","isbns":["7532740544"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":501,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/7f418071-0fdc-4a5a-a4c5-82dd1979d9c2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":319,"pdf_page":327,"physical_index":327,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2a3cdc76dcac7c83306eb6147382fa26ed5b3f4cd45163086691ed2d9f9f2b0e"},"chapter":"人工智能哲学","content":"从以上内容中我们看到了，在有关经典语言能力模型的两种立场中，虔诚的联结论者只能接受其中之一。这两种立场就是前面讨论过的牛顿式立场和次等立场。但是较深入的、基本的问题仍未解决。因为，在否认任何最高层次经典语言能力理论能够充分提示层次-2加工策略这一点上，牛顿式立场和次等立场是一致的，这里的层次-2加工策略是关于完成给定认知任务的中央在线联结论网络的。但是现在看来，这一点(见前文第1节)是一个令人加倍难堪的损失，因为经典语言能力理论执行着双重任务。首先，它描绘出认知科学研究所取的恰当形式(即勾勒出在形成语言能力理论层次上的任务的轮廓，然后编写算法来完成它)。第二，它描绘出认知科学中的解释包含些什么内容。拥有一个工作程序，仅这件事本身不能看作是对我们怎样完成一个给定的认知任务作出了解释。相反，我们需要的是关于程序遇到什么约束以及为什么必然会遇到这些约束的某种最高层次的理解一这一理解是通过给出最高层次语言能力理论而自然提供的，该理论可以看作是由一个给定的程序类来实现的。这样，经典语言能力理论失效时，就预示着这种危险：使联结论模型在相当深层的意义上成为非解释性的。同时也给联接论研究的实际方法论留下了疑难。\n\n12 联结论、语言能力和解释方式\n\n319","previous_page":318,"next_page":320}