{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b","title":"生产力 工业自动化的社会史","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300172651","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b","id":"8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b","uuid":"8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b","title":"生产力 工业自动化的社会史","normalized_title":"生产力工业自动化的社会史","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300172651","isbns":["9787300172651","0394512626"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":459,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%94%9F%E4%BA%A7%E5%8A%9B%20%E5%B7%A5%E4%B8%9A%E8%87%AA%E5%8A%A8%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%8F%B2","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8211d12f-42ae-4ed6-80ed-8c228ba7681b/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"324 / / 388","pdf_page":402,"physical_index":402,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9a59f26ff520b1219df61c92b18310d4ed0e1e3616ba6cd8c05db2fdfbfbd230"},"chapter":"第4章 关于自动化工厂的争议","content":"结语 另一种进步观\n\n当第二次工业革命展现在我们面前时，谁都可以看见，生产力今天已然成为制造历史的力量。工业机器再次成为这个历史舞台上的中心，而追求自动化程度更高的生产工艺则成为这一过程中的推动力量。但正如这项研究所表明的，这些机器本身从来都不是生产中的决定性力量，它们仅仅反映了生产中的决定性力量。在每一个时点上，这些技术进步都受到了各种力量的干预：社会统治权力阶层、全知全能的非理性幻想、具有合法性的进步观念以及技术工程本身与其社会生产关系的矛盾。如果说——历史学家伊丽莎白·福克斯·杰诺韦塞（ElizabethFox Genovese)与尤金·D·杰诺韦塞（EugeneD. Genovese)曾经这样写道“历史不过是讲述谁统治谁并如何统治的故事”，那么，技术史也不例外。1那种认为机器制造历史而不是人制造历史的技术决定论是错误的；这种观点对过于残酷而难以直接面对的现实给予了模糊的、神秘化的、逃避主义的以及息事宁人的解释。如果说施加在我们身上的社会变迁是不可避免的，那也是因为，这种变迁并不是遵从某种独立的技术逻辑，而是根据某种我们所有人都服从的社会逻辑。\n\n324\n\n/ 388","previous_page":401,"next_page":403}