{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 2","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","id":"86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","uuid":"86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 2","normalized_title":"剩余价值学说史资本论第4卷2","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":540,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%89%A9%E4%BD%99%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%B4%E5%8F%B2%20%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%AC%AC4%E5%8D%B7%202","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5/search"},"page":{"printed_page":267,"pdf_page":278,"physical_index":278,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9faa2b07d8235c6a49416c6874b842d7cd025a5f255d97d6180deaf9e17f3457"},"chapter":"剩余价值学说史","content":"$$\n\\sum \\limits _ { \\mathrm { E x } } ^ { \\mathrm { x } } \\mu ( t ) \\ddot { \\xi } \\ddot { \\xi } \\langle \\tau = 2 0 0 \\rangle \\quad \\stackrel { \\mathrm { x } , \\mathrm { } } { \\mathrm { E x } } \\mu ( \\xi ) \\dot { \\xi } + \\mu ( \\xi ) \\ddot { \\xi } \\dot { \\mathrm { E } } = 3 0 \\quad \\stackrel { \\mathrm { x } , \\mathrm { } } { \\mathrm { E x } } \\mu ( \\xi ) \\dot { \\xi } \\dot { \\mathrm { E } } = 4 0 \\quad \\stackrel { \\mathrm { x } , \\mathrm { } } { \\mathrm { E x } } \\ddag \\lbrack \\xi \\ddot { \\mathrm { E } } = 7 0\n$$\n\n这两个表，引起了一些极重要的说明。\n\n最先，我们看到了，以量计，绝对地租的涨落，是比例于投在农业内的资本，比例于投在Ⅰ，Ⅱ，Ⅲ内的资本总量。反之，绝对地租率却全然与投资量无关，因为绝对地租率完全和土地种类不同所引起的差额无关，却是由价值和价格间的差额生出，但这个差额自身，又由农业资本的有机构成决定，是由生产方法决定，不是由土地决定。\n\n在B表Ⅱ内，绝对地租额由10减为5，因为资本由100减为50，资本已有半数（从土地）撤除了。\n\n在我们进一步考察这二表以前，我们还要订立几个表。我们知道，在B表，市场价值已跌至每吨1H镑。但依照这个价值，ⅠA①不必会全然从市场退出，ⅡB也不必只要使用以前的资本的半数。因为在Ⅰ，在商品总价值120中，地租=10，或总价值的立，所以，在每1吨的价值（2镑）中也是这样。\n\n第二篇 地租\n\n267\n\n① 即A表的Ι。以下仿此。—译者。","previous_page":266,"next_page":268}