{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 2","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","id":"86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","uuid":"86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 2","normalized_title":"剩余价值学说史资本论第4卷2","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":540,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%89%A9%E4%BD%99%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%B4%E5%8F%B2%20%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%AC%AC4%E5%8D%B7%202","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/86f14e95-d82c-42da-bb47-8616d4e82ca5/search"},"page":{"printed_page":87,"pdf_page":98,"physical_index":98,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"20e7e442b99a8afe611080cac0925443a956a02675c0c3c976f3fb854a5a9499"},"chapter":"剩余价值学说史","content":"但别一些商品对谷物（必要生活资料）的价值比例是怎样决定呢？由它们所支配的劳动量决定。它们所支配的劳动量又是怎样决定呢？由劳动所支配的谷物量。到这里，斯密必然会陷于循环论法。附带说一笔。他在现实的说明上，从来没有使用过这个价值尺度。他和里嘉图说劳动是“商品价值的基础”，而“生产商品所必要的比例劳动量”是尺度，可以决定在交换上必须互相给予的财货量时（参看前书第80页）斯密是把内在尺度（劳动）和外在尺度（货币）混同了。里嘉图也常常这样做。其实，货币已经以价值决定法则做基础。\n\n斯密错误了。他看见一定量劳动可以交换一定量使用价值，所以推论说，这一定量劳动是价值的尺度，常常有相同的价值，而同量的使用价值却能表示极不相等的交换价值。但里嘉图是犯了二重的错误。第一，他没有了解那个使斯密陷于错误的问题；第二，他放弃了商品价值法则，逃遁到供求法则上面去，不由生产劳动力所费去的劳动量，但由生产那种归劳动者所有的工资所费去的劳动量，来决定劳动的价值，所以他实际是说，劳动的价值是由为劳动而支付的金的价值决定！但这又是怎样决定呢？这所支付的金量又怎样决定呢？由一定量劳动所支配的使用价值量决定呀！由此，他就每一个字都陷到斯密的矛盾中了。这个矛盾是他曾经攻击过的。\n\n第一篇 剩余价值与利润\n\n87","previous_page":86,"next_page":88}