{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","title":"我们何以成为后人类 文学、信息科学和控制论中的虚拟身体","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301280768","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","id":"8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","uuid":"8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","title":"我们何以成为后人类 文学、信息科学和控制论中的虚拟身体","normalized_title":"我们何以成为后人类文学信息科学和控制论中的虚拟身体","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301280768","isbns":["9787301280768"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":474,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%88%91%E4%BB%AC%E4%BD%95%E4%BB%A5%E6%88%90%E4%B8%BA%E5%90%8E%E4%BA%BA%E7%B1%BB%20%E6%96%87%E5%AD%A6%E3%80%81%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E5%92%8C%E6%8E%A7%E5%88%B6%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%AD%E7%9A%84%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%BA%AB%E4%BD%93","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68/search"},"page":{"printed_page":203,"pdf_page":216,"physical_index":216,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e6f3519a987d7e69a717d39b4647fd1e95ee90b854ad4b7c02f14e30d8e79198"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"他者的声音：瓦雷拉与具身\n\n《知识树》之后，瓦雷拉渐渐离开了保证自创生之独特性的（组织性）闭合(closure)。在《描述生命的逻辑：自创生概念的有效性与局限性》一文中，这种变化明显可见。1981年，米兰·泽勒尼（MilanZeleny）编辑了一本非常重要的文集《自生系统论：生命组织的理论》.《描述生命的逻辑》就是瓦雷拉对文集的贡献。瓦雷拉一方面强调自已依然看重自创生理论的价值，因为它“指出了自主性对于生命个体非常基本的一个疏漏”。另一方面，他也批评自生系统论既走得太远，又走得不够远(p.37)。在他看来，自生系统论在变成一种既用于生物组织又用于社会系统的范式方面，已经走得太远。他坚持认为，自创生不应该与广义的组织性闭合混为一谈，“自创生的定义具有某种精确性，因为它是以元件的生产概念(idea of production of components)为基础的，并且这种生产概念不可能被无限延伸却不损失自身的力量”(pp.37—38)。显然地，尽管细胞和动物的“身体”确实能够生产构成自身组织的“元件”，但社会系统不能（自我生产)。这一点，正是瓦雷拉和马图拉纳的分歧所在。瓦雷拉把自创生严格限制在“细胞与动物的领域”。在他看来，这里才是自创生理论最有用地方(p.38)。\n\n第六章 控制论的第二次浪潮：从反身性到自我组织\n\n203","previous_page":202,"next_page":204}