{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","title":"我们何以成为后人类 文学、信息科学和控制论中的虚拟身体","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301280768","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","id":"8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","uuid":"8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","title":"我们何以成为后人类 文学、信息科学和控制论中的虚拟身体","normalized_title":"我们何以成为后人类文学信息科学和控制论中的虚拟身体","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301280768","isbns":["9787301280768"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":474,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%88%91%E4%BB%AC%E4%BD%95%E4%BB%A5%E6%88%90%E4%B8%BA%E5%90%8E%E4%BA%BA%E7%B1%BB%20%E6%96%87%E5%AD%A6%E3%80%81%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E5%92%8C%E6%8E%A7%E5%88%B6%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%AD%E7%9A%84%E8%99%9A%E6%8B%9F%E8%BA%AB%E4%BD%93","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8770e87a-1162-4f3c-b374-e88b5e736a68/search"},"page":{"printed_page":456,"pdf_page":469,"physical_index":469,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7cfb416f01cecfffcba26657c158804186a8526f3b0f24ce7db122069a8ecd00"},"chapter":"第十一章 结论：变成后人类，意味着什么？","content":"[17]在《后人类身体》(Posthuman Bodies)简介中，哈伯斯塔姆和利文斯顿指出：“你先是后人类，继而才是人类，否则你永远不可能成为人类”，第8页。\n\n[18] 维罗妮卡·霍林格（Veronica Hollinger)在《女权主义科幻小说：分裂的主题》(“Feminist Science Fiction：Breaking Up the Subject”)，《推断》(Extrapolation)第31期（1990年)：229-239页中就女权主义科幻小说的多样性发表了类似观点。一些文章想恢复这一主题的某些方面，而其他文章的目的更具颠覆性和深远解构。霍林格观察到，那些从未经历过强烈统一的主观性的人，可能更希望有机会在解构前清晰地表达自已的这种主观性。安尼·巴尔萨摩(Anne Balsamo)：《无法拯救无知的女权主义》(“Feminism for the Incurably Informed”)，载于《南大西洋季刊》(South Atlantic Quarterly)，第 92期(1993 年)：第 681—712 页。安尼·巴尔萨摩在此文中对霍林格的结论提出了异议，指出，在众多文本读物中所需要的不是繁多的多样性，使其成为可以逃离反/前人文主义二元论的连接，以提供“后人类存在”的愿景，在这里，“科技”和“人类”是彼此理解的，并非是对抗的两个术语”，第684页。\n\n第十一章 结论：变成后人类，意味着什么？\n\n[1]非常感谢马乔里·卢瑟布林克(Marjorie Luesebrink)，我们之间的交谈激起了我对此结论的更深层次的思考。\n\n456\n\n我们何以成为后人类：文学、信息科学和控制论中的虚拟身体","previous_page":455,"next_page":457}