{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","title":"反俄狄浦斯资本主义与精神分裂(卷一)","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305294983","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","id":"885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","uuid":"885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","title":"反俄狄浦斯资本主义与精神分裂(卷一)","normalized_title":"反俄狄浦斯资本主义与精神分裂卷一","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305294983","isbns":["9787305294983"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":681,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%8F%8D%E4%BF%84%E7%8B%84%E6%B5%A6%E6%96%AF%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E4%B8%8E%E7%B2%BE%E7%A5%9E%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82(%E5%8D%B7%E4%B8%80)","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee/search"},"page":{"printed_page":17,"pdf_page":31,"physical_index":31,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"cb7ad3510078b4cee6ecc560b143e6a888461bf5fbdab9c262bc863105e7e935"},"chapter":"折射集 prisma","content":"在我看来，德勒兹的思想是一场经验主义者的暴动。他挥舞着经验主义的大刀，试图砍掉任何可能的超验性维度，小心防范着任何可能复活上帝的星星之火，同时又试图用这把经验主义的大刀硬生生地开出一条哲学的新路。这条新路会是什么样的？德勒兹并不关心，他所关心的只是这条路一定是新的，即差异化之路。德勒兹的思想本身就是一次思想的游牧，正如他清楚区分的那样：游牧民不是移民，移民是从一个定点移动到另一个定点，因此移民会关心这个新的地方应该是什么样的。而游牧民则是四处游荡，游荡本身就是一切，任何一个定点都只是暂时的，一旦成为旧的，就需要被扬弃。因此，对于创生性本身而言，它一定是永无休止的，它永远在路上。\n\n① Daniel W.Smith, Essays on Deleuze, Edinbrugh University Press, 2012, p. 235.\n\n② Deleuze, Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton, Continuum Press, 2001, p. 136.\n\n今天，为什么我们尤其需要阅读《反俄狄浦斯》？\n\n017","previous_page":16,"next_page":18}