{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","title":"反俄狄浦斯资本主义与精神分裂(卷一)","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305294983","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","id":"885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","uuid":"885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","title":"反俄狄浦斯资本主义与精神分裂(卷一)","normalized_title":"反俄狄浦斯资本主义与精神分裂卷一","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305294983","isbns":["9787305294983"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":681,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%8F%8D%E4%BF%84%E7%8B%84%E6%B5%A6%E6%96%AF%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E4%B8%8E%E7%B2%BE%E7%A5%9E%E5%88%86%E8%A3%82(%E5%8D%B7%E4%B8%80)","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/885e5112-8f04-4bc1-a4ec-56f64be9f6ee/search"},"page":{"printed_page":215,"pdf_page":359,"physical_index":359,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0bec9a56f8e4ea475e894102fa114abaafa053e7ea60fa635499930eb17ef8c8"},"chapter":"第三章 未开化的、野蛮的，被文明化的","content":"215\n\n① Victor W.Turner, «Themes in the Symbolism of Ndembu Hunting Ritual» , in Myth and Cosmos, Natural History Press, 1967, pp. 249 – 269.\n\n②皮埃尔·博纳菲(Pierre Bonnafé)，《魔法之物、巫术以及拜物教》(«ObjetMagique, Socrcellerie et Fétichisme?») Nouvelle Revue de Psychanalyse. 1970, n°2,(“库库牙人lesKukuya]确认事物的本质并不重要，其关键在于事物如何行动”)同时参见 Alfred Adler，L'Ethnologue et les Fétiches，《精神分析新期刊》(NouvelleReuue de Psychanalyse)中的一期主旨在于讨论“拜物教的物”，在其中，人种学家们并没有将一种理论与另一种理论对立起来，而是通过其特定的人种学实践的效用以及人种学所研究的社会实践来质询精神分析的阐释成果。在一部名为《特纳的阐释》(Les Interpretations de Turner)(南泰尔学院的教师)的作品中，艾瑞克·劳瑞特(EricLaurent)就这一方面以某种深刻的方式去讨论了方法问题：构筑一系列颠倒的必要性，让使用优先于阐释抑或合法性论证，让生产性优先于表述性，社会场域的当代状态优先于宇宙论层面上的神话，简洁的仪式优先于结构性模型，“富有戏剧性的社会”，政治的战术和策略优先于亲缘关系的谱系。\n\n反俄狄浦斯：资本主义与精神分裂(卷一)262","previous_page":214,"next_page":216}