{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"1010a / 74","pdf_page":78,"physical_index":78,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e454dfd0689c7e7e99e39b016d20ba6d37cc3afb2422f6aafb91eedf2f7c0935"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"010a將自然地失望嗎？因为这样的寻求真理何异于追逐空中的飞鳥。①思想家們所以要执持这样意見，其緣由就在实是中求其所是的时候，他們將感觉当作了实是；可是在可感觉世界中，存在有許5多未定性質—那些未定物所存在的特殊意义，我們上已述及；所以他們說得相当高明，但所說幷不真实—与其象爱比卡尔謨那样的批評齐諾芬尼③，毋宁作这样的批評。因为在动变中的事物无可为之作成真实的敍述，他們看到了自然界全在动变之中，就說“然沒一时刻沒一角落不在动变，所以沒一事物可得确实地予10以肯定”。就是这一信念发展成上面提及的理論，如那个聞名已久的赫拉克利特学派克拉底魯所执持的学說，可算其中最极端的代表，他認为事物如此动变不已，瞬息已逝，吾人才一出言，便已事过境迁，失之幻消，所以他最后，凡意有所詣，只能微扣手指，以示其蹤跡而已;他評議赫拉克利特所云“人沒有可能再度涉足同一条15河流”④一語說：“在他想来，人們就是涉足一次也未成功”。\n\n可是，我們將答复这辯論說，他們关于动变的想法是有些道理在内的，然而总是可訾議的，虽說在变动中的事物尚非实在的事物，可是事物之有所消失者必先有此可消失者在，事物之今兹变現20者，必先有某些事物在。一般說来，一物灭坏，必將因此而变現有某物；一物生成，必有所从而生成之物在前，亦必有为彼而有此生成之物在后，而这一过程不能无尽已的进行。——但暂且不管这些問題，讓我們坚持这一点，同一事物，所变的不在量与質。卽便\n\nΓ 5\n\n1010a\n\n参看“希腊古諺”卷二，677。\n\n②見于1009a32。\n\n⑧参看凱伊培尔(Kaibel)辆“殘篇”252。大約爱比卡尔謨(Epieharmus)曾对齐諾芬尼(Xenophanes)思想做过这样的批評：“这既不高明也不确实”或“这是确实的但并不高明”。\n\n④“残们”31。\n\n74","previous_page":77,"next_page":79}