{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":193,"pdf_page":197,"physical_index":197,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3aebcbd7a7946ec48540d71daa93d333e75287a85d1e32de9b9915e67cc1b72f"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"明显地，于是，我們如把元一在字义上作最严格解釋，这就是5一个計量，主要是量的計度，次要为質的計度。有些事物以在量上不可区分者为一，另一些則是在質上为不可区分；所以“一”的不可区分应别为兩类，或者絕对是一，或当作是一。\n\n章\n\n关于元一的本体与本性，我們該詢問这究屬存在于兩方式的10那一方式中。这恰正是我們在列敍疑难时①所举的一題；“一”是什么，我們必须怎样設想这“二”；我們应否將元一作为本体(毕达哥拉斯学派先會这样說过，在后柏拉图也这样主張)；或者我們毋宁由元一的底层别求其本性，象自然哲学家們所認知者，或以元一15为“友〈爱〉”，或以元一为“气”，或以元一为“未定”。②\n\n于是，照我們在先討論本本与实是时所曾言及，③假如普遍性<共相〉均不能成为本体，而普逼实是本身，凡其命意为“与諸是相拟”④而为是者，亦不能成为本体(因为这还是与“多”相共通)，而只能作为一个云謂，則“一”也显然不能成为本体；“是”与“一”原为20一切云謂中最普遍的云謂。所以一方面諸科屬不能脫离其它事物而成为某些实是与本体；另一方面，实是与本体不能为科屬，“”同样也不能成为科屬。\n\n又，元一的本性在各范疇中均必相似。現在，“一”然具有与\n\n1053b\n\n12\n\n①見卷B，1001a4-b25。\n\n②所举自然哲学三家之說为恩培多克勒、阿那克西米尼与阿那克薩哥拉。\n\n③见于卷Z，章十三。\n\n④xaoàτàπolλa，“与多相比拟”或作“与多同在”，或作“由多分离”解：其实义为 “普遍之是”，相对于“个别之是”。此章論一之共相与殊分相应于普遍性与个别性。 “普遍”云謂見“釋文”17a31。\n\n193","previous_page":192,"next_page":null}