{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":204,"pdf_page":298,"physical_index":298,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"10dc0b868fae20431ade46976fc7301ca9e213b2ab59c7ef80c97b34cd108f12"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"类的“是与非是”之結合才使事物得成众多？这一思想家①以之与“是”相結合而使現存事物得其众多性之“非是”为虚假与虚假性。这就象几何学家將“不是一尺長”假定为一尺長，而举称这就是我  \n25 們必须将一些虚假作成为假定的理由。几何学家不以任何虚假事物为假定(因为前提与推断不相及)，事物所由創成或化人的“非是”也不是这样命意。但因“非是”在諸范疇中为例便各有不同，而且除此之外，虚假与潛能均屬“非是”創造实际出于潛在性的非是；  \n30人由非人而潛在地是人者生成，白由非白而潛在地是白者生成，至于所生成者为一为多殊无与乎非是。\n\n明白地，問題在于其命意为本体之实是怎样成为多；因为創的数与綫与体，原就有許多。可是这正奇怪，于实是之为“什么”就可以專要考詢其安得成多，却不考詢实是之为質为量者又安得成多。当然“未定之兩”或“大与小”不会是白有雨种，或色，味有多种，1089b形狀有多种的原因；若說这些也出于“未定之兩”或“大与小”，那么色、味等也將成为数与單位了。但，他們若研究到其它这些范疇，也就可以明白本体的众多性之原因何在了；各范疇諸实是的众多性之原因，正是这相同的②或可相比拟的事物。在寻取实是与5元一的对反以便由此对反和实是与元一共同生成事物，他們进入相同的迷途而指向于那个相关詞項(卽“不等”)，“关系”并非实是与元一的对成，也不是它們的否定，而只是象本体与素質一样，为\n\n10实是之一个类別。他們应該詢問这一問題，何以相关詞項有許多而不止一个。照說，他們已研究到何以在第一个1〈原一>之外还有許多1，却拜不进而考詢在这“不等”之外另有許多“不等”。然\n\nN2\n\n1089b\n\n①指铂拉图：参看“詭辯家”237A，240。柏拉图以虚假为“非是”，亚氏所举諸非是不尽符柏拉图原义。\n\n②参看卷Λ，章五；此处所指为“物質”或潛在，与下文1089b16行相符；又与29行相符，亦指“底层”。\n\n204","previous_page":203,"next_page":205}