{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":210,"pdf_page":214,"physical_index":214,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1445d420153d248ceb87b642a4229de7a2ecc4cf40ad2b57eef65a6fc8824e32"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"論諸因之研究。因为(甲)这不涉及极因。(极因出于善性，归入作用与动变范圍；而善之究竟則归到原动者，一但在不动变事物而論，則幷沒有这么一个最初使之动变的事物。)①(乙)这也难說.1059b我們現所勤求的学术，可否泛涉可感覚事物，抑只可專論非威覚事物。若为非感觉事物，这就应是通式或数理对象。現在（子）通式显然拌不存在。(若承認通式存在，这就难說数理对象何以不該象其它具有通式之事物一样存在于这世界上。这些思想家將数理对5 象，安置于通式与可感覚事物之間，作为这世界上的事物与其通式雨系列之外之第三系列；但在理想人馬与个体人馬之外，实际并无第三人与第三馬。在另一方面，如不承認他們的想法，則数理之学又將研究什么？那就一定不是这世界上的事物了；因为这类事物10都不是数学的对象。）那么（丑）我們現所勤求的学术也不是为了数理对象；因为一切数理对象均不能独立存在。可是，这又拜不專研可感觉事物；因为它們是可灭坏的。②\n\n15 大家將会詢問到那一門学术討論数学材料上諸問題。这不屬于物理之学，因为全部物学專門研究具有动靜原理諸事物；这也不屬于实証之学；因为这一学术所研究的就只是它所实証的那一  \n20类知識。这样还得讓我們所尚論的哲学来处理这些問題。\n\n大家又可討論我們这門学术是否主于研究所謂要素的各理論；大家認謂一切組合事物之中存有各种要素。\n\n但，这也該想到我們所勤求的学术应該是研究普遍性的；因为53每一公式与每一学术均以普遍原則而不以最低品种为对象，④照\n\n1059b\n\n①参看卷B,996121—b1。\n\n②参看卷B,997a34—998a19。\n\n③“数学材料”实指与可感覚事物相对的可理解事物。这問题，卷B内未提出：但見于卷Z、章九。\n\n④参看卷B，998b15\n\n210","previous_page":209,"next_page":211}