{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":221,"pdf_page":225,"physical_index":225,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c997a0268d8c6479d93574d007f475c5a0b26fcf863e3311f7abaf188b2078bf"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"題之所是，則“不白”也將为白的主題之所是了①〈这是不可能25的。>\n\n所以，我們不能接受赫拉克利特②或阿那克薩哥拉的观念。如果認为那些观念是对的，則对成的兩端將可《同时〉为一主題的云謂；当阿那克薩哥拉說：“物皆含有万物的各一微分”，这也就是20說甜的事物不異于苦的，③于其它諸对成亦然，于是万物之含存于各物者不仅为其潛能，又且是各別的实現。相似地，这不能說一切敍述全假，也不会全真，因为若說一切是假，則連他那原理也該是假，而若說全真，那么，我要是說“这全是假的”也不能成为假了；从35 这祥的論題更可演釋其它种种的困惑。④\n\n章 七\n\n每一門学术各为其范園内所可認識的事物覓取某些原理与原1064a因—例如医学与健身术以及其它制造之学或数学.都是这样的。各門皆自限于其所研究的各类事物之中，似若勤求諸事物之所由存在与成实者，一揆其实际則不然;研究存在与实是者乃另一門学术，全不同于这些学术。上所提及各門学术于各类事物之何以5成其“怎是”者各有一得之見，而于努力闡明其它真理亦往往爸臻于專精。可是，它們所得的“怎是”或出于感覚，或出于假說而已；总之，归納这一类的学术，會无一門可得为本体及其怎是作証者。\n\n10 有一門自然学术显然与实用之学及制造之学兩皆不同。以生产知識而論，动变之源在生产者，不在所产物，这动变之源就是艺术或其它职能。相似地，于实用之学而論，动变之源在有所作为之\n\n1063b\n\nK7\n\n①参看卷Γ，1011b23-1012a24。\n\n已見本卷1062a31--b2。\n\n③阿那克薩哥拉語原意是甜物亦多少存有芳味。亞氏所摘取者只是在名学方面的一些語病。参看第尔士編“殘篇”11，菩納脱“早期希腊哲学”129节。\n\n④参看卷I,1012a24—b18\n\n221","previous_page":null,"next_page":222}