{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":223,"pdf_page":227,"physical_index":227,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"88d4c34a02057b86828ae95b3ed44ecfec6650004367e942227530724347ab9f"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"章八\n\n15 因为“实是”諸命意之一为屬性〈偶然〉之是，我們必須考虑到实是的这一方面。明显地，傳統諸学术均不管偶然屬性問題。建术不考虑那些將要住在那屋内的人們（例如他們住此屋内一生  \n20吉或凶，或乐或悲的閣題)，紡織，或制鞋或縫衣，亦然；每一門学木所考虑的只是各自范圍内自身的目的。至于辯論題目，如“凡現有的常为先未曾有，是故“无’可为“有’”，所以苟有誰能識曲而放能文者，就应是先不識曲亦不能文，而一朝就既已識曲又且能文  \n25这类忮詞①除了詭辯家以外，已成立的各門学术都不会去管这些問題；因为这些都是屬性之是。所以当柏拉图說②詭辯家以“非是”为業，他說得不算錯。\n\n30 我們若試体察屬性〈偶然〉之是究屬何物，就可明白屬性之該是不会得有的。我們說每一事物或謂常然，或謂必然(必然的思不是說出于暴力，只是可以訴之于卖証而知其必然)，或大多？如此，这是一类，另一一类是并不大多数如此，亦非常然，亦非必然.35而只是出于偶然机会>;例如伏天可以寒冷，但不会常然，亦非65a然，亦不大多数的伏天如此，虽則这可以有时而遭遇。于是.偶屬性可以釋为遭遇，而不是常有，必然，或大多数可有的遭遇。現在我們已將屬性之是說明，大家也該可懂得这样一門学术不能5立：因为一切学术只能研究常常或大多数如此的事物，而偶然屬性不是这一类事物。\n\n显然，屬性之是不象本性之是那样，具有原因与原理；如其有原因与原理，这將成为必然的了。如有B就有A，如有C就\n\n1064b\n\nK8\n\n①这一詭察忮詞与卷E，章二中所举例不同；此忮詞之癥结在濫用\\~àμφóre2a中uμ(“郎刻”或“同时”)一字，此字現譯“一朝”。\n\n②参看卷E，1026b14脚站。\n\n223","previous_page":222,"next_page":224}