{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":259,"pdf_page":263,"physical_index":263,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fe5b2c09628ab92bfb5f52688834a291e68eed235782c0c823b5f6d6100189c9"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"卷（M）十三\n\n章一\n\n我們先已在“物学”論文中②陈述了可感觉事物的本体与物質，以后又③討論过具有实現存在的本体。如今，我們研究的問題  \n10是：在可感觉本体之外，有无不动变而永恆的本体，若說有此本体.則又当研究这是什么本体。我們应該考虑到各家的主張，倘彼誠立說有誤，吾人当求免于同样的瑕疵，如吾人之用意与諸家不无相通而可互为印証之处，則吾人亦可无憾于自己的議論；人欲推陈出  \n15 新，以鳴其道于当世，良愿于古人所已言及者有所裨益，如其未必胜于昔賢，亦愿不至甚愧于旧說而已。对这問題有兩种意見：或謂数理对象一—如数，綫等—为本体；或謂意式是本体。因为(一)有些人認为意式与数学之数屬于不  \n20同的兩級，(二)有些人認为兩者性質相同，而(三)另一些人則認为只有数理本体才是本体，④我們必須先研究⑤数理对象是否存在.如其存在，則研究其如何存在，至于这些是否实际上卽为意式，是否能为現成事物的原理与本体以及其它的特質，均暫置不論。以  \n25后，我們再照一般的要求分別对意式作一般的討論；⑥許多論点，\n\n①卷M与N之編排自古启人疑难：(1)兩卷分界淺实应在第十三卷之第九章1086a21，以下各章似较以上各章先写成。(2)兩卷各章节編排頓参差。(3)第十三卷中第四第五章此評意式論几乎是卷一第九章之重复。唯有的差別是在卷一中語气出于一柏拉图学派，而卷十三則已是亞卡台米学院(Academy)以外的批評家笔調。\n\n②見“物学”卷一。 ③見卷 Z, H, Θ.\n\n@依次指柏拉图，齐諾克拉底和毕达哥拉斯学派与斯泮雪浦。\n\n参看本卷第二第三章。 ⑥参看本卷第四第五章。\n\n259","previous_page":null,"next_page":260}