{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":27,"pdf_page":31,"physical_index":31,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"324e9f84e4663f1ba65e63185ebae042d630e9248ea93889057c4cd05ffa92b0"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"而不是数本身；不应該因为这是〈某些底层物質的〉数比，就以意式为数。①\n\n又，众数可成一数，但怎能由众通式成为一通式?若說一个数，如一万，持不由众数組成而是由諸單位<諸一>組成，那些單位又何如？元論說它們在品种上是相似的或不相似的，都將引出許多荒謬的后果(无論是說一个定数中的諸單位相異，或說一个定数与另一定数中的諾單位相異)；②它們各无特質，將凭何物以成其相異？这不是一个可赞美的观念，而且也与我們对單位的想法不符。\n\n又，他們必須建立第二类的数，（在算术上运用这些，）拌建立被某些思想家所引称的“間体”;这些又如何存在，从何发生？又或要問，在現世事物与理想数之間为何須要有間体？\n\n又，說是二中的兩單位，每一个都立从一个先天之二③中得来；但这是不可能的。\n\n又，为什么一个数由若干單位合成之后就必须作为一个整体？\n\n再者，除了上述諸疑难外，單位倘有多种，則柏拉图学派就該象那些講元素有四或有二的人一样，各各予以明析;但那些思想家5將火与地称为元素，幷不曾先闡明它們有何相同的底質——如都有实体一一而是分别賦与“元素”这一通名。事实上柏拉图学派所講單位也象火或水一样，是全体匀和而同質的；若然，数便不是本体。④明显地，如果有一个“絕对一”而以此为第一原理，則“一”当須具有双关命意以适应不同作用；如其不然，这就不能成立<为类乎“元素”之單位〉①。\n\n991 b\n\nA9\n\n25\n\n30\n\n992a\n\n①本节若干句原文造語累贅而有所未达，可能有抄本錯誤。991b19—20行“致比”非“数”之論点也未必能令数論派折服。可参看1092b20—22。\n\n②此节大意可于卷M章六、七，窥見一斑。諸單位之相通或不相通，可参看1081a5—12.\n\n③先天之二卽未定之“雨”。\n\n④这就只該是計算用的数学之数。参閱卷M，1081a5--12。\n\n27","previous_page":26,"next_page":28}