{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":29,"pdf_page":33,"physical_index":33,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8c05c69e294c659a1c3dad2a523bcccb109c36399e6340d9d10da7ca4ee02439"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"又，人們可以照他們的請法推想，作为本体的底层物質，作本体的云謂与差異者，也屬于数，亦即是說这些底层拟于物質而本身挂非物質。这里我所指的是“大与小”，如同自然哲学家所說“密与疏”一样，为底层的初級差别；因为这些也就是“超越与缺損”的諸品种之一。至于动变，“大与小”若作为动变，則通式显然將被动变；它們若不作为动变，动变又將从何产生？自然的全部研究就此被取消了。\n\n說事物悉归于一——想来这是容易为之作証的，实际还沒有10証明；因为所有例引的方法③只証明有“絕对之一”〈本一>存在，郎便我們承認所有的假設—也未証明所有事物悉归于一。假如我們不承認通例<普遍〉是一个科屬，則“絕对之一”那祥的結論也不可能引致；而且这在有些事例上原来也是行不通的。④\n\n在数之后，綫与面与体怎样发生而能存在，以及它們具有那些15意义，这也未能予以說明；因为这些不能是通式(因为它們不是数)也不是“間体”(因为間体是一些数学对象)，也不是可灭坏事物。这明显地是一个<与上三类>不同的第四类⑤\n\n992 h\n\nA9\n\n992b\n\n①指斯泮雪浦，另看本書卷Z，章二。斯泮雪浦（Speusippus,?-336)柏拉图姪，公元前347年繼其叔为学院主持人。\n\n②参看柏拉图“理想国”卷七，531D，533B--E。992a30—34指青斯泮雪浦等以数学龍盖一切：造句說理是不充分的。其大意是在陈述艺术上有“美善”为极因，而数与通式照数論派与意式論派的講法，均廣式因，没有极因的学术不应充当哲学。\n\n③“例引”：由实事設例而引向抽象結論，可参関本音卷Z，1031b21；卷N，1090a17。“xθeσls可譯作“例引法”，或“解释法”。亞历山大註疏說明其法大略如此：举若干个人而求其共同之处，以定人之通例，再举人、馬、猴等而求其简之通例，最后万物必通于一。\n\n④盖指“关系”与“否定”詞项。\n\n⑤见本卷M,1030b23-30;1085a7--9。\n\n29","previous_page":28,"next_page":30}