{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":293,"pdf_page":297,"physical_index":297,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b0d16ceadf7694bd1e5b75ab7a9955dda80e4fb91421e208f6389b0f7be1d2fa"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"組成要素。\n\n有些人①列敍与“元一”共为作用的要素是“未定之兩”，幷以此責难“不等”之說引起迷惑，其所持理由可謂充分；可是他們虽因此得以解除以“不等”为关系，以“关系”为要素所由引起的疑难，但这些思想家們用那些要素来制作数，无論这是意式数或是数学数，还得于其它方面遭遇一样的誹議。\n\n許多原因使他們导向这样的解释，尤其是他們措置疑难的方式太古老了。他們認为若不違离而且否定巴門尼德的名言，一切現存事物均应为“元”，亦即“絕对实是”。\n\n“非是永不会被証明其存在为实是”\n\n他們認为事物若确乎不止于“一”，这就必須証明非是为是；因为只5有这样，諸事物才能由“实是”与“另一些事物”租合而成“多”。③\n\n但，第一，实是若具有多項命意（因为这有时是本体，有时指某一素質，有时指某一量，又有时指其它的范疇)，而非是若被假定为不存在，則一切現存事物所成之一將是什么一类的“一”？是否  \n10以諸本体为一，或以諸演变和相似的其它范疇为一，或各范疇合而为一——这样，“这个”与“如此”，与“这么多”以及其它諸范疇，凡指称某一級实是的，悉归于“一”？但这正奇怪或竟是不可能的，世上出現了單独的一物〈非是〉竟就帶出了这么多的部分，其一部分  \n15为一个現存的“这个那个”，又一部分为一个“如此如彼”，又一部分为一个“那么大小”，又一部分为一个“此处彼处”。\n\n第二，事物究竟由那一类的“非是与是”来組成？因为跟着“是”一样“非是”也有多項命意；“不是人”意指不是某一本体，“非直”意指某素質之非是，“非三肘長”意指某一量度之非是。于是那一\n\n1C89 a\n\nN\n\n35 1089a\n\n①似指齐諾克拉底。\n\n②见第尔士編“戎篇”7，井参看柏拉图“色埃德托”180E。\n\n③参看柏拉图“詭辯家”237A，241D，256E。\n\n293","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}