{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":299,"pdf_page":303,"physical_index":303,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7712fd3592343ba01e59c2ba4ad7f16f75bf18bc9c888ac15b0e94576f48e5d5"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"把永恆事物賦予創造过程这也是荒謬的，或者竟是不可能的。这毋需置疑于毕达哥拉斯学派曾否以創造屬之于永恆事物；因为  \n15 他們明自地說过无論是由面或表面，或种籽，或那些他們所未能說明白的元素，来構成元一，总是一經構制，原来那无所限的便立卽为这些极限所定限了。②既然他們是在構制一个世界，而是以自然  \n20科学的言語建立理論，对于这样的理論我們加以察核，自非过当.但在目前这研究中姑讓它去吧；我們現在研究的是在那作用于諸不变事物的原理，我們必須研究这一类数的創生③\n\n这些思想家說奇数沒有創造过程，这就等于說偶数出于創造；25有些人幷指明偶数是最先由“不等”制成的一当“大与小”平衡为“等”时就創出偶数④那么，“不等”在被平衡以前当必屬于“大小”。假如大与小常是被尘衡，那么在先便沒有“不等”；因为所常在的只是等，不等就是不常在了。所以明显地，他們引进数的創造30說，于理論并无裨益、⑤\n\n章 四\n\n要素与原理如何与美和善相关的問題中，存着有一个疑难，人們若不能認取这疑难是該受責备的。疑难是这样：在諸要素中是否有我們所意指善特至善这样一个要素，或則本善与至善应后于諸要素。神学家們似乎与現代某些思想家相符，⑥他們以否定答\n\n1091 a\n\nN4\n\n①假定“大与小”或“未定之雨”是在倍乘，参看卷M，章七1082314。\n\n②参看“物学”卷三第四章，卷四第六章全章。又参看菩納悦“早期希職哲学”第53节。\n\n③貝刻尔本，第杜本，及罗斯露本均以此行为第三章終，但下文23一28实与此节相承。有些抄本章四由29行起。\n\n④参看卷M，章七1081a25—26。\n\n⑤参看“說天”卷一，279b32-280a10。\n\n⑥指斯件雪浦；参看卷Λ，1070b31。\n\n299","previous_page":298,"next_page":300}