{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":30,"pdf_page":34,"physical_index":34,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f0f001b1f174e3deb22a5dc0409533e3b11de6a23abb522faf7b27a100e6194a"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"事物之存在涵融着許多不同命意，不辨明其复杂性而要覓取所有存在的要素，一般是不可能的，用这样含混的方式研究事物租成要素之性質是无益的。因为所能发現的要素只是本体的要素，至于什么是“作用”或“被作用”，或“深固”不可及处的要素，实际是不一定能发現的;所以說要統研一切現存事物的底蘊，或自意謂已掌握了一切要素，都是未必确到的。\n\n25 我們怎能习知一切事物的要素？明显地我們不能先知而后学。开始学习几何的人，卽使他嫻于其它事物的知識，可是于所拟修习的几何这門学术当是全无知識的；其它类此，那么，若象有些人所主張的，世上有一門統括一切事物的学术，則修习这門学术的30 人該是先前一无所知的了。可是一切学习无論是用“实証法”或用“界說法”进行，必須先知道某些“前提”（知道一些或全部前提）以为依凭；界說<定义>的要素必須先已知道而熟习；用“归納法”来学  \n93a 习也相似，①若說知識真的基于宿慧②，这很奇怪我們不知道自己具有这样偉大的知識。\n\n又，人怎样得知一切事物用什么構成，知道以后又怎样能將自己所知向人表明，这也是一个疑难；因为意見可以互相抵触；例如5关于某些字母，有人說ζ(za)是σ与δ与α三音注的拼合，另有些人則說这是另一个音注，③与我們其它已熟識的音注沒有一个相切。\n\n又，如沒有具备相应的官感，我們怎能認識各种不同感覚的各\n\nA 9\n\n992 b\n\n20\n\n①dπodeiξ：(实証)出于动字“灘开来”，或譯“証明”。ρlσós(定义)出于动字“划定界限”放又譯“界說”。èxaγγì(归納)出于动字“引致”(或“引导”)；柏拉图“政治家”278A，用此字作“引誘”意。πpooiμlα为导言，譯作“前提”，指論証或定义上之要素。\n\n②τvγlvoι σvμpóτo; oτσo，知識“出于自身”，或知識“真易内在”;其意所指在柏 拉图的“宿慧”(∂vuμηots)。見于柏拉图“美諾”(Meno)81C，“斐多”72E.\n\n③ζ为一独立的希脱字母，但音与σJa三拼音相似。\n\n30","previous_page":29,"next_page":31}