{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":327,"pdf_page":331,"physical_index":331,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b4f6faa242aebd814939be00c00f066afcf194409e638253bf87fe97b4e3820a"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"章九以“大与小”諸品种为物質原理創制几何 对象之諸困难。 1085a3—1085223\n\n意式論之一般困难[旁涉]。 --1085a31\n\n以相似于“單与众”的原理創制几何对象，其闲难相同。 —1085b4\n\n以“單与众”制数同样不合适，众为有限抑无限？ -1085b21\n\n点如何創制？ —1085b34\n\n綜結对于数論之批評。 —1086a27\n\n关于意式論之批評——苏格拉底之定义普遍不离个別，意式論者則使之分离而独立。 —1086b14\n\n章十 本体的第一原理为个别性抑普遍性？答\n\n案:潛能不离实現，普遍不离个别。1086b14—1087a25\n\n卷(N)十四 繼續批評意式論與数論\n\n章一 各家应用对反为第一原理；但諸对反不能作为第一原理。 1087a26—1087b5\n\n柏拉图学派应用“元一与众多”对反之諸品种为第一原理，頗为混淆。 —1087b33\n\n“元一”或“單位”为一計量而涵存有底层事物，不是一个本本；与此相似，“不等”和“大与小”，由量性而入于关系范疇者，也不是一个本体。 —1088b14\n\n章二 永恆本体不能由要素組成。 1088b14—1088b35\n\n柏拉图学派以“虚假”論“非是”，以“非是”符“众多”，其目的在解釋实是之为本体，何以由一〈單>而成多<众>。 -1089a32\n\n327","previous_page":326,"next_page":328}