{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":45,"pdf_page":49,"physical_index":49,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5313684769b50f7fd950d1c130f3771fdb470891b72e656ad85899f57fc10df2"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"公式；而以科屬来取定义就不同于以其組成部分来說明事物。①\n\n再者，如以科屬为原理，則应以最高的科屬，抑应以最低的品15种为之原理？这也是可以引起爭論的。如果認为愈普遍的总是愈近于原理，則明显地，最高科屬应为原理；因为这些可以作一切事物的云謂。于是，全部事物如可分多少基本科屬，世上就將有多少20 原理。这样，实是与元一均将是原理与本体，因为这些是一切事物的最基本云謂。但无論“”或“是”又都不可能或为事物的一个独25 立科屬；因为科屬中各个差異必須各自成“一”并成“是”；但科屬脫离其所涵有的各个品种，就不应該涵有其间差异的云谓；那么如果“一”或“是”作为一个科屬，其中所有差異均不会成“-”而为“是”可是若把原理作为科屬，則一与是倘不是科屬，也就不能成为原理，又諸間体包括其差異一直到最后不可复为区分者为止，在理30論上应为科屬；但实际上，这个，有些或被認为是科屬，有些則未必是。此外差異之可称为原理，也幷不减于科屬，甚至可說更接近于原理；如果差異也称为原理，則原理的数目实际將成为无尽，尤其99a 是我們所假定为原理的科屬愈高則所涵的差異也愈多。\n\n但是，如以元一为更近于原理，而以“不可再分割者”为一，所謂不可分割者就指每一事物在数量与品种上为不可分割而言，于是凡不可再分割的品种就应先于科屬，而科屬則可以区分为若干  \n5 品种(“人”不是个别諸人的科屬)，那么，这应是作为最低品种的不可分割物，为更近于元一。又，凡有先天与后天分别的事物必与其所先所后的事物相联系(例如“二”若为列数中的第一个“数”，各个品种数以外便不能別有一个科屬数；相似地各样品种“图形”以  \n10外也不会别有一个科屬“图形”；这些事物的科屬倘不脫离其品种而存在，其它事物的科屬也应如此；要是有可分离而独立的科屬，\n\n999a\n\n998 b\n\nB3\n\n①998a20—b14答案见于卷Z,章十、十三。\n\n45","previous_page":44,"next_page":null}