{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":50,"pdf_page":54,"physical_index":54,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9245285dc2cf7098ba19b375a3f410474aa4f3105b9fdd20691fc602060ba249"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"他站起来要求应得的光荣，时間已經来到，\n\n这曾由一个严肃的誓言，規定了他輪值的次序。①\n\n15这詩末行暗示了动变是必然的;但他沒有說出所以必然动变的原因。可是，在这里只有他说得最週到了；因为他并不說有些事物可灭坏，有些事物永不灭坏，他只說除了元素以外，其它一切事物均  \n20可灭坏。②而我們現在的疑难則是，事物苟由同一原理支配，何以有些可灭坏，有些不灭坏。关于可灭坏与不灭坏事物必須有兩种不同原理，我們的說明暫止于此。但若說原理真是兩別，問題又来了，灭坏原理也跟着事物灭坏，不灭坏原理也跟着不灭坏？假如它們是可灭坏的，它們仍还是  \n25由元素組成的事物，因为一切事物之灭坏就是那物体解消而复归于組成它們的各个元素；这样說来，在这些可灭坏原理之先必然还另有其它原理。但这又是不可能的。是否这样的追溯將以达到某一定限为止，抑將是进行至于无穷？又，可灭坏原理若归消失，則可灭坏事物如何还能存在？若說原理永不灭坏，何以有些依此原  \n30理組成的事物却仍归灭坏，反之依别的原理組成的事物却幷不灭坏？这些或不尽然，但是其然或不然，总得費很大的勁来进行証明。实际并沒有人真的坚持“可灭坏与不可灭坏事物出于各别的  \n11a 原理”这样的主張；大家都認为同样的原理可以应用于一切事物。他們將我們上面所提的③疑难当作一些碎屑，囫匾嚥了下去。④\n\n(十)最难解而又是最需要研究的真理还在“是与一”是否即事5物的本体，是否各极其本，一为一，是为是，而幷无别义，抑或“一与是”另还涵有其它相依的性質。有些主于前說，有些主于后說。柏拉\n\nB4\n\n1000h\n\n①“疫篇”30。\n\n②参看第尔士磊“先苏格拉底”第三版，卷一，209，11—21。\n\n③見于1000a5—b21。\n\n④1000a 5—1001a3 参看1060a 27—36。其答案見于卷 Z 章七至十.\n\n50","previous_page":49,"next_page":null}