{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":52,"pdf_page":56,"physical_index":56,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"48c0c8140d94d966b4be94afadc658bd7277f31af2ec5f9d58fa4fe76a50bcd9"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"又，照芝諾的定理，①本一若为不可分、則將成为无是。他認为凡增之而不加大，損之而不减小的事物，均非实是，这样，他所謂10实是显然都得有量度。如有量度，这又將是物体；实是之具有物体者，具夸各个量向<長短，闊狹，深淺>；其它数学对象，例如一个面或一条綫則在某兩个或某一个量向可以增損；在其它量向是不能增損的；②而一个点或一个單位則是全沒有量向的。但他的理論不\n\n15算健全，(不可分的事物相并时，虽不增益其量度，却可增益其数)。而且不可分物这样的存在就在否定他的理論，一一个量度怎能由这样一个或多个不可分物来組成？这就象是說一条綫是由点制成的一样。\n\n20 即便作出这样的假定，依照有些人的說法，数出于“本一”与“另个非一的某物”，我們还得提出这样的疑問：如这“非一”就是“不等”，③与“本一”同为数和量度之原理，何以“本一与不等”之产物，有时为数，有时又为量度。这可不明白，怎么量度可以由“二”  \n25与“这个原理”得来，也可以由某些“数与这个”原理得来。④\n\n章 五\n\n(十三)与此相联的一个問題是“数”与“体与面与点”是否为本体一类。若說不是，这使我們迷惑于事物的本体究是什么，实是又是什么。演变，运动，关系，趋向，比例似都不足以指示任何事物0的本体；因为这些都可为主詞的說明，却都不是“这个”〈事物之所\n\nB5\n\n1001b\n\n①参看第尔士編“先苏格拉底”第三版卷一，170，16—38。埃利亞人芝諾(Zeno，約公元前461)，巴門尼德弟子。\n\n②例如綫与綫相接則其綫引长；然綫与綫相井則并不加暖。\n\n③指柏拉图的数理哲学，参看卷M1081a24。\n\n④1001a4—b25答案見于卷Z1040b16—24；卷I，章二。“一与这个”卽“一与不等”，“数与这个”郎“数与不等”。\n\n52","previous_page":null,"next_page":53}